Re: [basex-talk] Memory footprint for a certain query is much higher usisng BaseX10 compared to 9

2022-08-16 Thread Alexander Witzigmann
works wonderful - appr. same memory footprint as using 9.x release and similar and fast response time ... thanks alex Am 12.08.2022 um 20:28 schrieb Christian Grün: …and I’m looking forward to your feedback on the latest snapshot [1]. Best, Christian [1] https: //files. basex. 

Re: [basex-talk] Memory footprint for a certain query is much higher usisng BaseX10 compared to 9

2022-08-12 Thread Christian Grün
…and I’m looking forward to your feedback on the latest snapshot [1]. Best, Christian [1] https://files.basex.org/releases/latest/

Re: [basex-talk] Memory footprint for a certain query is much higher usisng BaseX10 compared to 9

2022-08-12 Thread Christian Grün
I managed to get this reproduced [1]. A first JMC analysis indicates this seems to be related to the revised data structures for main-memory updates [2]. A small overhead would be expectable and acceptable, but definitely not on this scale. Thanks for the observation. [1]

Re: [basex-talk] Memory footprint for a certain query is much higher usisng BaseX10 compared to 9

2022-08-12 Thread Alexander Witzigmann
Ah I see -for the create db part I missed the list of element names. Stored in variable $enames One of them is the referenced one and the rest are any name 5-15 chars long. There are round about 30 elements / I assume the real name doesn’t make a difference… each of them are unique in the list

Re: [basex-talk] Memory footprint for a certain query is much higher usisng BaseX10 compared to 9

2022-08-12 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Alex, > declare variable $input := {for $idx in (1 to > 1) return {for $e in $enames return element {$e} { attribute > {"content"} {$idx; > db:create("test-db",$input,"test.xml") Looking at the subsequent query, I assume there must be additional "Objektkurztext" elements. Do you have