-konstanz.de
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
Hi again,
I had a quick look into the monitoring code, and I noticed two things:
1. It looks to me (correct me if I’m wrong) as if the code of the project
was initially written for Saxon and then ported to BaseX. If you
10:05:21
>>
>> 03:21:15
>>
>> Check Multi schéma 2022 FRH
>>
>> 06:25:46
>>
>> 06:31:47
>>
>> 00:06:01
>>
>> 10:05:55
>>
>> 11:39:07
>>
>> 01:33:12
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* Lia
:31:47
>
> 00:06:01
>
> 10:05:55
>
> 11:39:07
>
> 01:33:12
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Liam R. E. Quin
> *Envoyé :* samedi 20 avril 2024 05:00
> *À :* ANDRADE Antonio ;
> basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> *Objet :* Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue wi
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 08:54 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
> At this moment, the XML document is not intended to be stored. This
> is why it is not loaded into a database before processing.
BaseX is designed to operate primarily on documents in the database,
which is why i suggest trying that.
an.uni-konstanz.de
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:45 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
Hie,
For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I compared
the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines.
First, you should consider
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:45 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
> Hie,
>
> For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I
> compared the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines.
First, you should consider (as i think Martin said) the Java runtime
startup time,
. The
Python/bash difference for the calling script does not seem to explain the
observed performance differences.
De : Hans-Juergen Rennau
Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2024 11:25
À : basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de; ANDRADE Antonio
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
Hi
Am 19.04.2024 um 10:45 schrieb ANDRADE Antonio:
Hie,
For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I
compared the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines. I
observe a performance gap of a factor of 100 to 200 depending on the
use case (see functions
Hi Antonio,
my experience is very different - quite comparable performance, except for very
specific cases, e.g. massive use of fn:idref(). Furthermore, the performance of
BaseX is often so stupendous that an improvement by an order of magnitude (not
to mention two) appears to me very
9 matches
Mail list logo
