Re: [basex-talk] WWW-Authenticate header

Hi Christian, I've tested this and the multiple %perm:allow annotations again with the latest snapshot. Both are working as expected now. Thank you for taking care of this. Best regards Johannes Am 04.02.2019 um 14:57 schrieb Christian Grün: Hi Johannes, If the error code 401 is returned,

Re: [basex-talk] Global lock = false and parallel update processes to different DBs

Hi France, > I noticed that the latest version of BaseX lost this feature and nothing > seems to replace it. I'm trying to improve performance of batch processes and > I was counting on that feature a lot. Any change it will come back or that > something equivalent will come? With BaseX 9, we

Re: [basex-talk] WWW-Authenticate header

Hi Johannes, If the error code 401 is returned, the BaseX standard authentication values had been assigned to the response header. I have revised this a little: With the latest snapshot, the BaseX authentication header will only be assigned if the user does not provide a custom header in the

Re: [basex-talk] %perm:allow annotation

Good catch! It has been fixed in the latest snapshot. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:42 PM Johannes Bauer wrote: > > Hi again, > > I've another question about the %perm:allow annotation. Is it possible to use > multiple instances of this annotation? > > My expectation would be that any of the