Re: [basex-talk] Optimize database never returns, leaves database in "opened by another process" state

2024-03-04 Thread Eliot Kimber
As reported in a separate thread, I’m still getting the optimization failure for large databases but not smaller ones. This behavior is consistent in my tests. Cheers, E. _ Eliot Kimber Sr Staff Content Engineer O: 512 554 9368 M: 512 554 9368

Re: [basex-talk] DBA Editor behavior in v11 not as expected

2024-03-04 Thread Eliot Kimber
Now that I’m using an expected extension, a bit more feedback on the Editor UI. Having saved a file and then not modified what’s in the editor, opening a new file should not prompt for confirmation as the editor isn’t “dirty” and there can be no data loss (the contents of the editor were just

[basex-talk] Inconsistency in base-uri()

2024-03-04 Thread Eliot Kimber
Using BaseX 11 (but I think the code is the same in BaseX 10). I’m trying to understand how base-uri() behaves relative to how it should behave when the database path of a document is not a valid URI, i.e., it has a space in it. First I have this test: let $doc as document-node() := document

Re: [basex-talk] Inconsistency in base-uri()

2024-03-04 Thread Christian Grün
…just a quick reply: That’s probably related to [1], an ancient issue, in which I tended to recommend the usage of db:path. I wish we’d finally find time and ressources to tackle this. [1] https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/1172 On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:49 AM Eliot Kimber wrote: > Using

Re: [basex-talk] Inconsistency in base-uri()

2024-03-04 Thread Eliot Kimber
Oh right—I submitted that issue 9 years ago ! Any solution will be challenging due to the age of the current behavior and the twisty nature of the code. My use of @xml:base may be somewhat singular as it’s specific to the way that DITA works and I don’t know that there is any other XML

Re: [basex-talk] DBA Editor behavior in v11 not as expected

2024-03-04 Thread Christian Grün
…thanks; we’ve added some usability tweaks in the editor. On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:15 AM Eliot Kimber wrote: > Now that I’m using an expected extension, a bit more feedback on the > Editor UI. > > > > Having saved a file and then not modified what’s in the editor, opening a > new file should