[WARNING: VIRUS REMOVED][basex-talk] Message could not be delivered

2014-04-22 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
Your message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

Your message could not be delivered because the destination computer was
not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.

Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but
it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not
have a mail system running right now.

Your message could not be delivered within 5 days:
Mail server is not responding.

The following recipients could not receive this message:

Please reply to postmas...@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
if you feel this message to be in error.

This attachment contained a virus and was stripped.
Filename: letter.zip
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Virus(es): Troj/ZipMal-AW

Re: [basex-talk] 7.8.2 Updating function items

2014-04-22 Thread Christian GrĂ¼n
Hi Marco,

 XUST001 Updating function items are not yet supported

 when passing an updating function as a value. This used to work neatly from
 7.6 at least onwards.
 I must admit that I'm pretty surpirsed and I'd like to ask where ni the docs
 I could get more info on that.

the behavior in 7.6 was not clean, which is why it was removed in more
recent versions. However, the latest XQUF draft (not public yet) now
provides an updating keyword, which can be used to invoke updating

  UpdatingFunctionCall  ::=  updating PrimaryExpr ( (ExprSingle
(, ExprSingle)*)? )

Issue 939 will be closed as soon as we have implemented this in BaseX
[1]. As an alternative, if you set MIXUPDATES=true in BaseX 8.0, you
won't encounter any restrictions regarding the invocation of updating
and non-updating functions.


[1] https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/939