Re: [basex-talk] BaseX request from Saxon XSL transformation

2015-11-18 Thread cmarchand
Thanks, I was reading the same articles... It was just to check if something already exists... Best regards, Christophe Le 2015-11-18 11:35, Dirk Kirsten a écrit : > Hello Christophe, > > I've never done this, but I'd say that extension functions are the way to go. > If I read the

[basex-talk] Upcoming: XMLPrague 2016

2015-11-18 Thread Christian Grün
Dear all, In around three months, it will be the 5th time that we'd like to organize user meeting in Prague. This time, the XML Prague conference takes place from Thursday to Saturday, Feb 11-13, and our meeting will be onThursday. As you all do so many exciting things with BaseX, we would be

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX request from Saxon XSL transformation

2015-11-18 Thread Dirk Kirsten
Hello Christophe, I've never done this, but I'd say that extension functions are the way to go. If I read the saxon documentation correctly (http://www.saxonica.com/html/documentation/extensibility/functions/), you can use it to call Java functions from within XSLT. As BaseX is written in Java

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX request from Saxon XSL transformation

2015-11-18 Thread Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
A more convenient way (at least for Java amateurs like myself) might be to set up a RESTXQ service in BaseX and to query it using plain fn:doc(''). At least this works for GET requests. If you need to post something, you’ll probably need the EXPath HTTP client library [1] that doesn’t ship with

[basex-talk] BaseX request from Saxon XSL transformation

2015-11-18 Thread cmarchand
Hello, I have to query a BaseX database from a XSL transformation. Does someone has ever done this ? I have no idea where to look in... I use SaxonEE, so I can write an extension function, if needed... Best regards, Christophe

Re: [basex-talk] zip:update-entries - unexpected results

2015-11-18 Thread Christian Grün
> Please note: the Wiki entry for the Zip module still reads: "It may soon be > replaced by the Archive Module. " I agree, the wording is a bit fuzzy. Indeed we wanted to remove the ZIP Module, but as it’s still used in some applications, it’s still available. What better wording do you have in

Re: [basex-talk] zip:update-entries - unexpected results

2015-11-18 Thread Hondros, Constantine (ELS-AMS)
Hi Christian, Thanks - I rewrote to use the archive module and it works beautifully. Please note: the Wiki entry for the Zip module still reads: "It may soon be replaced by the Archive Module. " I'll happily update the Wiki entry for you if you like. Kind regards, C. -Original