Re: [basex-talk] losses von tags?

Am 01.11.2017 um 22:54 schrieb michael4...@arcor.de: Hello, There is a *problem in transforming data vom XML in HTML*. In XML there are HTML-tags included. XML original: *text is important.* HTML goal: *text is important.* (1) result: text is important. let $data := text is important.

[basex-talk] losses von tags?

Hello, There is a problem in transforming data vom XML in HTML. In XML there are HTML-tags included. XML original: text is important. HTML goal: text is important. (1) result: text is important. let $data := text is important. return {$data/data()} (2) result: text is important.

Re: [basex-talk] Rounding/parsing decimal vs float

Awesome Leo, thanks! Similar to what I was thinking about but with a lot or after-thought optimization! Great suggestion. M. Il 01 nov 2017 1:59 PM, "Leonard Wörteler" < leonard.woerte...@uni-konstanz.de> ha scritto: > Hi Marco, > > I also do not know of a built-in way to do this, but here is my

Re: [basex-talk] ?==?utf-8?q? Rounding/parsing decimal vs float

Hi Marco, I also do not know of a built-in way to do this, but here is my shot at an implementation in XQuery. It uses fast exponentiation [1] and throws a custom error if there is more than one "e" in the input. Hope that helps (or is of interest), I had fun hacking it together, Leo

Re: [basex-talk] Rounding/parsing decimal vs float

You need to use xs:float or xs:double instead of xs:decimal to be able to use the 'e' or 'E' as the exponent separator. Br, Kristian K1. nov 2017 13:18 kirjutas kuupäeval Marco Lettere : > > Hi all, > > I thought of asking this in parallel of hacking my own parsing

[basex-talk] Rounding/parsing decimal vs float

Hi all, I thought of asking this in parallel of hacking my own parsing procedure ... Is there a native way to parse scientific notation string into xs:decimal since a direct casting (xs:decimal("1e1")) is not allowed? Thanks, Marco.

Re: [basex-talk] Flexible update via function

Hi Michael, > Manipulation of an XML structure with flexible declare function > > If there are some similar issues or solutions in BaseX community, > this will be very interesting. Any other sources to learn more about? You can have a look at the lecture slides that are listed at [1],

Re: [basex-talk] UnaryLookup expression failure

Hi Günther, Thanks for the concise bug report. I stumbled across a similar issue just recently [1], so I’m glad to confirm that the latest BaseX 9.0 snapshot returns the correct result [2]. All the best, Christian [1]