Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Thanks everyone for the kudos. > Yes, great question. We were asking this ourselves too. > > > Does this just mean all modules listed at > > http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Module_Library are statically bound? Exactly.

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Yes, great question. We were asking this ourselves too. M. On 17/04/19 11:33, Andy Bunce wrote: I am not clear what is meant by: > - no need to import basex-api modules anymore! Does this just mean all modules listed at http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Module_Library are statically bound? /Andy

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Thanks for this. I particularly like db:dir, which I think will help with creating performant collection-based views of databases. I am not clear what is meant by: > - no need to import basex-api modules anymore! Does this just mean all modules listed at http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Module_Library

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Thanks! Great work as usual! M. On 16/04/19 16:10, Christian Grün wrote: Dear all, We are more than pleased to announce version 9.2 of BaseX, our XML framework, database system and XQuery 3.1 processor: http://basex.org/ This time, we have put a special focus on performance improvements:

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Christian and the rest of the BaseX team, Many thanks for the Spring Update -- I can't wait to have fun with this release! Best, Bridger On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:10 AM Christian Grün wrote: > Dear all, > > We are more than pleased to announce version 9.2 of BaseX, our XML > framework, databa

[basex-talk] BaseX 9.2: The Spring Edition

Dear all, We are more than pleased to announce version 9.2 of BaseX, our XML framework, database system and XQuery 3.1 processor: http://basex.org/ This time, we have put a special focus on performance improvements: XQUERY PERFORMANCE - comparisons will more often be rewritten to hash joins -