Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2021-06-23 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Karlo, > Where does basex set the location of the configuration? If you point me > to the file, I might try changing it. By default, BaseX creates and updates the configuration files in the project’s "Home Directory". This directory is determined at startup time as described in the Wiki [1].

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2021-06-21 Thread karlo
Liam R. E. Quin writes: > The things that are binary-only, if they have a compatible licence, > could either be included or added in a separate package. Indeed, when registering it with a package repository, we would replace those binary libaries with dependent packages from the repository. Liam

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2021-06-21 Thread Liam R. E. Quin
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 14:51 +0200, Christian Grün wrote: > It would be great if those > of you who are using Linux and UNIX-based systems could have a look > at > Kralj’s package and tell us about your observations! The things that are binary-only, if they have a compatible licence, could either

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2021-06-21 Thread Christian Grün
Dear Kralj, That’s a great contribution; I really appreciate your efforts. A little while ago, Bridger asked users on the list to share their experiences installing and running BaseX. It would be great if those of you who are using Linux and UNIX-based systems could have a look at Kralj’s

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2021-06-20 Thread karlo
Dear Christian, With your help I have prepared a new version with a similar user interface but that also builds BaseX. The released binaries run perfectly of course, so the role of the source build package is to demonstrate that the binaries are built from a free source. Because the package

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-18 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Kralj, Thanks for your generous offer to prepare future packages for us. I would also target your third option and try to automatize the process as far as possible. This way, you won’t need to feel responsible for all the time coming. The core of our packaging routine is an ancient Perl

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-16 Thread karlo
Alexander Holupirek writes: > You might have already seen that we did some packaging for Debian GNU/Linux > [1], but it is currently not very up-to-date. Would you be interested in > revising and adopting the process? Would be of great help :-) Dear Alexander, I did see that package. It

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-16 Thread Alexander Holupirek
Hi Kralj, thanks for your efforts on packaging BaseX for Linux. Very appreciated! You might have already seen that we did some packaging for Debian GNU/Linux [1], but it is currently not very up-to-date. Would you be interested in revising and adopting the process? Would be of great help :-)

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-16 Thread karlo
Dear Christian, I recommend this style for now as the default binary package for GNU/Linux operating systems. It would also work well for BSD-derived operating systems. You probably weren't asking about Android, but since that also uses Linux, I note that I don't know whether this is how one

Re: [basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Kralj, Thanks for your packaging proposal, very appreciated. We’ll have a look at it in the near future. Would you recommend it as default distribution for all Linux systems, or are there possible restrictions that may need to be considered? The current build system is based on Windows

[basex-talk] Package for system integration

2020-09-13 Thread karlo
I have packaged basex in a way that I believe will be easier for integration with package managers. https://klarinet.kos.ovh/fossil/basex-root-install/uv/basex-9.4.3.tar.gz >From the root of that archive, you can build and install like this. make make install # as root The above will