Am 17.08.2020 um 11:55 schrieb Christian Grün:
> out why before we follow this path). Has anyone of you already worked
> with XML representations of YAML?
Joe Wicentowski[1] did something here [2]. But I did not use it, yet.
[1]: https://github.com/joewiz
[2]:
Hi Marco, Hans-Jürgen, Martin, Fabrice,
I had a look at the YAML spec [1], and I noticed it’s somewhat more
bulky than the JSON spec [2]. In addition, I checked out the YAML to
XML conversion of FasterXML. It seems to handle the basic cases, but
e.g. cannot process lists, comments or references.
Hans-Jürgen, thanks for you assessment. I see that there may be no real
need for a JsonML equivalent for YAML. And my assumption is that the
binding from yaml.org my be the most appropriate solution for now. Similar
to our JSON mapper, it uses underscore element names to represent arrays.
Remark: support for a roundtrip-able XML representation of YAML would
consolidate BaseX's great position as a data integration platform, further
increasing the number of continents (mediatypes) which can be travelled on the
highway of XPath (XML, JSON, CSV, HTML, YAML).
In comparison, I think,
I was wondering if you can successfully serialize any arbitrary XML
document to a YAML representing, ideally without losing information
(attributes, comments, etc.), and convert the result back to the original
XML representation.
I would guess that YAML to XML conversions is easier.
Apart from
@Marco: Do you know which conversions are provided by FasterXML:
arbitrary XML → YAML, arbitrary YAML → XML, or both? If the underlying
conversion rules are promising, we could include them a 'fasterxml'
format in BaseX (similar to the 'jsonml' format).
As far as I can understand from the
The XML binding from yaml.org might be a good start
(https://yaml.org/xml). I have opened a little issue for a future YAML
Module [1].
@Marco: Do you know which conversions are provided by FasterXML:
arbitrary XML → YAML, arbitrary YAML → XML, or both? If the underlying
conversion rules are
Hm, not sure but maybe FasterXML's Jackson? It supports alternative non
JSON data formats among which YAML, XML.
But maybe that one is a huge dependency.
M.
On 12/08/20 12:38, Christian Grün wrote:
Hi Marco, hi Fabrice,
YAML serialization would be a nice feature indeed.
Are you aware of
Am 12.08.2020 um 12:38 schrieb Christian Grün:
YAML serialization would be a nice feature indeed.
Are you aware of existing (ideally bidirectional) mappings that would be
appropriate for general use?
At XML Prague, Norm did a demo of casting YAML to JSON as described in
Hi Marco, hi Fabrice,
YAML serialization would be a nice feature indeed.
Are you aware of existing (ideally bidirectional) mappings that would be
appropriate for general use?
Cheers
Christian
Marco Lettere schrieb am Mi., 12. Aug. 2020, 12:04:
> Dear BaseX team,
>
> just out of
Envoyé : mercredi 12 août 2020 12:04
À : BaseX
Objet : [basex-talk] Yaml serialization
Dear BaseX team,
just out of curiosity, could you imagine what kind of effort it would be
to provide YAML as another serialization method for BaseX in addition to
XML, HTML, JSON, CSV?
The datamodel seems pretty
Dear BaseX team,
just out of curiosity, could you imagine what kind of effort it would be
to provide YAML as another serialization method for BaseX in addition to
XML, HTML, JSON, CSV?
The datamodel seems pretty close to the JSON one so maybe a very similar
transformation to XML could be
12 matches
Mail list logo
