>
> Both [1] and [2] seem to work ,
> though on [2], node() still seems to be the slightly faster alternative
> (when knowing that elements can only contain at least one non-whitespace
> character, or are empty otherwise, as is the case with my data).
Exactly: If you write your own queries and
Hi Christian,
Fun it is, two birds with one stone! Both [1] and [2] seem to work ,
though on [2], node() still seems to be the slightly faster alternative
(when knowing that elements can only contain at least one non-whitespace
character, or are empty otherwise, as is the case with my data).
Hi Ron,
The proposed option has been added to the latest snapshot [1,2].
In addition, we’ve optimized the evaluation of fn:normalize-space. If
it’s applied on element nodes, it will internally be rewritten to a
more efficient representation: E[normalize-space()] →
Hi Christian,
As always, many thanks for your lightning-speed help!
The update command appears to be way out of my physical memory league,
but I'm subscribed to the GitHub issue.
Best,
Ron
On 20/04/2023 14:28, Christian Grün wrote:
Hi Ron,
I agree that would be helpful. I’ve added a
Hi Ron,
I agree that would be helpful. I’ve added a GitHub issue [1].
As you’ve already indicated, you can post-process your databases
instances. I think the easiest query for that is:
delete nodes db:get('db')//*[empty(node())]
…followed by an optional db:optimize('db').
Best,
Christian
5 matches
Mail list logo