Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup

2004-08-26 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi Jeremias, Thanks! I have a new small patch for FOP that tells Batik not to raserize clipped components (I'll submit over on fop-dev). This is of course one of those tricky 'bootstrapping' issues, since you can't apply the patch until after you integrate a new Batik... :/ Jeremias Maerki wr

Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup

2004-08-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
PDFObject.formatDateTime() is now compatible to JDK 1.3 again. On 16.08.2004 22:26:47 Thomas DeWeese wrote: > >>1) It looks like a JDK 1.4 dependency has slipped in: > >>java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal pattern character 'Z' > > > > Yes. I will see to that. FOP officially still tar

Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup

2004-08-16 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Jeremias Maerki wrote: The limitation to 72dpi in the PDF transcoder has the undesired side effect of outputting embedded images in a very low quality. Removing it improved quality a lot here. Yah, my original thought was to have the PDFGraphics2D rasterize at something like 150-300dpi (configu

Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup

2004-08-16 Thread Jeremias Maerki
(comments inline) On 15.08.2004 22:53:16 Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Thomas (and all), > > > > I'm currently tracking down differences between the PDF and PS > > transcoders. The following thread triggered that: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=th

Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup

2004-08-15 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thomas (and all), I'm currently tracking down differences between the PDF and PS transcoders. The following thread triggered that: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=825221 There's an SVG attached to the first post. It's a SVG with width and h