Re: error when image not found

2001-09-26 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KL> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:40:32 Thomas E Deweese wrote: >> [...] for some reason you are hitting the default broken-link >> handler instead of the SVG broken link handler. [...] KL> I've found out where the problem is. The BrokenLink.svg

Re: error when image not found

2001-09-26 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:40:32 Thomas E Deweese wrote: > Thanks for working with me on this... > > I think I have tracked it down to a bug in the way BufferedImage > handles properties (see attached Java file for demonstration). > > So I guess I'll bend an put in the 'instanceof' check

Re: error when image not found

2001-09-25 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KL> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:22:36 Thomas E Deweese wrote: >> What about printing the 'img'? Is it a GraphicsNodeRable8Bit? KL> it is org.apache.batik.ext.awt.image.renderable.RedRable@aeb74 KL> The object returned is this KL> java.lang.Ob

Re: error when image not found

2001-09-25 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:22:36 Thomas E Deweese wrote: > What about printing the 'img'? Is it a GraphicsNodeRable8Bit? it is org.apache.batik.ext.awt.image.renderable.RedRable@aeb74 > Since I still can't reproduce the problem (is it possible there is > some sort of build issue?). Can you

Re: error when image not found

2001-09-25 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KL> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:20:42 Thomas E Deweese wrote: >> > "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> KL> Using the current cvs I get this class cast exception. This KL> happens if an image cannot be found. >> This seems

Re: error when image not found

2001-09-25 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:20:42 Thomas E Deweese wrote: > > "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > KL> Using the current cvs I get this class cast exception. This > KL> happens if an image cannot be found. > > Hmm, I (or you for testing purposes) can easily wrap the cast in