Reduction of 2 concatenated matrix-based affine transforms not supported in svggen?

2001-09-04 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "EP" == Evenblij, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EP> While working on a solution which should make it possible to cache EP> raster image data (yes, I have a working version!;) I noticed the EP> following: EP> org.apache.batik.ext.awt.g2d.TransformStackElement has a method EP> "concatenat

cvs commit: xml-batik/sources/org/apache/batik/bridge SVGImageElementBridge.java SVGMarkerElementBridge.java SVGSVGElementBridge.java

2001-09-04 Thread tkormann
tkormann01/09/04 05:31:52 Modified:sources/org/apache/batik/bridge SVGImageElementBridge.java SVGMarkerElementBridge.java SVGSVGElementBridge.java Log: The clip:rect( ) property now works properly on marker, svg, symbol and image e

Re: Reduction of 2 concatenated matrix-based affine transforms not supported in svggen?

2001-09-04 Thread Vincent Hardy
Thomas E Deweese wrote: > > > EP> Do people agree that this is a bug? Are there compelling reasons > EP> for this behaviour (e.g. performance)? Is there a reason why I > EP> should not fix this? My code for caching images is quite heavily > EP> dependent on transformations to get the image

RE: Reduction of 2 concatenated matrix-based affine transforms not supported in svggen?

2001-09-04 Thread Evenblij, Paul
Vincent Hardy wrote: > Thomas E Deweese wrote: > > > > [...] > > I'm guessing it is done so people can read the result. I can > > make a lot more sense out of: > > > > transform="rotate(45), scale(0.5)" > > > > As opposed to: > > transform="matrix(0.35, 0.35, -0.35, 0.35, 0, 0)"

RE: Reduction of 2 concatenated matrix-based affine transforms no tsupported in svggen?

2001-09-04 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "EP" == Evenblij, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EP> Okay. Thank you for that clarification and suggestion. The problem EP> currently is that I get long transform strings in *matrix* EP> notation, e.g.: EP> because there is no code to collapse matrices. This is even less EP> readable tha

Re: Reduction of 2 concatenated matrix-based affine transforms not supported in svggen?

2001-09-04 Thread Vincent Hardy
Paul, "Evenblij, Paul" wrote: > > Vincent Hardy wrote: > ... > > > > Thomas is right, this was done so that the svg is more readable > > [...] > > However, I agree that if you keep modifying the transform you > > end up with a long transform string which no longer makes sense... > > In addition

Printing

2001-09-04 Thread Mark Claassen
I have been in conversation with P. Race at Sun about some of the prining issues with Java for some time. In a recent letter, he said that font.deriveFont() (in 1.4 beta2) will not render the fonts as printer fonts, causes large spool file sizes. Instead he said to scale the whole graphics objec

Bug report for Batik 1.0 [2001/09/04]

2001-09-04 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned