[jira] [Commented] (BATIK-1197) Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1

2017-08-08 Thread Sven Haster (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16118089#comment-16118089 ] Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197: [~ssteiner1] What exactly should we see in that mail? It seems to

[jira] [Commented] (BATIK-1197) Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1

2017-08-08 Thread Sven Haster (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16118050#comment-16118050 ] Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197: This is a problem for us also. We have a dependency on fop, which

[jira] [Commented] (BATIK-1197) Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1

2017-08-08 Thread Sven Haster (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16118064#comment-16118064 ] Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197: Excluding jython seems to work (ie, it removes the duplicate

[jira] [Commented] (BATIK-1197) Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1

2017-08-09 Thread Sven Haster (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16119563#comment-16119563 ] Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197: Yeah, I'd also rather see these dependencies made {code:xml}