Re: name for list of notes fields (was Re: Add some BBDB tests)

2012-08-14 Thread Leo
On 2012-08-14 05:34 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > However, Leo's proposed change could also affect function names such > as bbdb-record-note and bbdb-record-set-note that address individual > note fields. To be internally consistent, these should become > something like bbdb-record-ext and bbdb-re

Re: name for list of notes fields (was Re: Add some BBDB tests)

2012-08-13 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Aug 13 2012 Ivan Kanis wrote: > "Roland Winkler" wrote: > > On Sun Aug 12 2012 Leo wrote: > >> (bbdb-defstruct record > >> firstname lastname affix aka organization phone address mail notes cache) > >> > >> We should rename `notes' in the above to `ext' (for extensions). `notes' > >> and

Re: name for list of notes fields (was Re: Add some BBDB tests)

2012-08-13 Thread Ivan Kanis
"Roland Winkler" wrote: > On Sun Aug 12 2012 Leo wrote: >> (bbdb-defstruct record >> firstname lastname affix aka organization phone address mail notes cache) >> >> We should rename `notes' in the above to `ext' (for extensions). `notes' >> and `note' are both used in the BBDB and they confuse

name for list of notes fields (was Re: Add some BBDB tests)

2012-08-12 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Aug 12 2012 Leo wrote: > (bbdb-defstruct record > firstname lastname affix aka organization phone address mail notes cache) > > We should rename `notes' in the above to `ext' (for extensions). `notes' > and `note' are both used in the BBDB and they confuse me every time. Me too, I was an

Re: Add some BBDB tests

2012-08-11 Thread Leo
On 2012-08-11 00:30 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > On Sat Aug 11 2012 Leo wrote: >> A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd >> behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some >> months old. > > Certainly it would be good if you could post here if

Re: Add some BBDB tests

2012-08-10 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Leo wrote: > A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd > behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some > months old. Certainly it would be good if you could post here if anything appears to be a true regression. > BBDB2 has so

Add some BBDB tests

2012-08-10 Thread Leo
Hello, A few weeks ago I upgraded to BBDB git head and experienced some odd behaviours that I have to revert to my last working copy which is some months old. BBDB2 has some nice tests to ensure regression doesn't happen as often. Would that be a good idea for bbdb3? Leo --