On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:48:38 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> On Wed Feb 23 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:54:12 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
>> Could you consider moving to Git or Bazaar for development? CVS is
>> very inconvenient. I can't use it from work, for instanc
On Wed Feb 23 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:54:12 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
>
> RW> On Thu Jan 20 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> >> Let me know when you've figured out what portions and authors need to be
> >> tracked down. I'll work with Chong Yidong and you to do it.
>
>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:54:12 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> On Thu Jan 20 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Let me know when you've figured out what portions and authors need to be
>> tracked down. I'll work with Chong Yidong and you to do it.
RW> I'll try to make some kind of table that shows ho
>> Regarding Re: BBDB ELPA-style packaging; Roland Winkler
>> adds:
> On Thu Jan 20 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Let me know when you've figured out what portions and
>> authors need to be tracked down. I'll work with Chong
>> Yidong a
On Thu Jan 20 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Let me know when you've figured out what portions and authors need to be
> tracked down. I'll work with Chong Yidong and you to do it.
I'll try to make some kind of table that shows how the functionality
in the current code (functions and variables) relate
>> I'd be OK with providing BBDB3 in a beta form through
>> elpa.gnu.org. As long as the version string states it clearly,
>> which it will. You are likely to get plenty of feedback.
> Feedback is always appreciated!
Talking about feedback: is there some warning/discussion about the
change of form
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:17:27 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> On Wed Jan 19 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> A rewrite is the worst case, where you can't find the original
>> contributor or they are not willing to assign the copyright to the FSF.
RW> Some pieces of BBDB in their original form are r
On Wed Jan 19 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I'd be OK with providing BBDB3 in a beta form through
> elpa.gnu.org. As long as the version string states it clearly,
> which it will. You are likely to get plenty of feedback.
Feedback is always appreciated!
> A rewrite is the worst case, where you can't
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:24:18 -0600 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> On Fri Dec 17 2010 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> You should decide:
>>
>> - do you want to take patches from Emacs or keep them separate?
RW> I'll be happy to take patches from anybody, if they help to fix bugs
RW> in the code or to impro
On Fri Dec 17 2010 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> You should decide:
>
> - do you want to take patches from Emacs or keep them separate?
I'll be happy to take patches from anybody, if they help to fix bugs
in the code or to improve the code in any other way. If it turns out
that a patch collides with anyt
10 matches
Mail list logo
