On January 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> How same is "same"? I mean, you could write the compiler's version
> string into a variable and compare for equality, but that seems a bit
> extreme.
By same I mean that the same features are available. I really don't
know how generous this is, so prac
> "Ronan" == Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronan> I would really, REALLY like to force the compile
Ronan> environment to be the same as the run environment;
Ronan> specifically, if you compile BBDB under Emacs Y, then it
Ronan> will only run under Emacs Y.
How same
Benjamin Rutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe people who want the luxury of running BBDB with multiple emacsen
> can live with running BBDB uncompiled? Or, they could maintain
> multiple installation dirs and compile for multiple emacsen.
If you run Debian, I think this is what happens, eve
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I would really, REALLY like to force the compile environment to be
> the same as the run environment; specifically, if you compile BBDB
> under Emacs Y, then it will only run under Emacs Y. This would allow
> a lot more compile-time optimizing of t
On January 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What's the best solution for library writers then? Do you know
> of any code examples where this is handled well?
I think the right way to go about this, and certainly the way I intend
pushing the BBDB source, is to firstly centralise all the versioning
n
On January 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> featurep of XEmacs 21.1 and newer has fairly sophisticated emacs
> version testing support. Has this been implemented for GNU Emacs
> yet?
See, this is still a problem, because if you're on XEmacs 21.1 the
feature already exists and there's no testing to
Chris Beggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Lots of packages define missing functions in order to run on Emacs and
>> XEmacs. Other packages test wethere critical functions are bound or
>> not, and then assume they are on Emacs or XEmacs. :(
>>
>>
> "Chris" == Chris Beggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Lots of packages define missing functions in order to run on Emacs and
>> XEmacs. Other packages test wethere critical functions are bound or
Hi Alex, All!
featurep o
From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Lots of packages define missing functions in order to run on Emacs and
> XEmacs. Other packages test wethere critical functions are bound or
> not, and then assume they are on Emacs or XEmacs. :(
>
> I've had a similar problem with one package or an
Galen Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I found the issue. table.el has caused me a few headaches now.
> For some reason, it finds its way into the middle of compilations
> and then the resultant compiled code has issues. I ran the bbdb
> uncompiled (whew, is it slow) and I was able to perfor
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On , January 9, 2002 at 23:34:01, Galen Boyer wrote:
>> I am continually getting the following type of message.
>>
>> Invalid face text property value: red [12 times]
>
> Hmm, I think there is no face in BBDB which is red unless you
> defined/chang
On January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Was this the problem the original poster had? Is he trying to
> alter a record which somehow has face information, since records
> can be created this way? That was the point of my post.
>
> Chris
Where this problem seems to occur most frequently is i
From: Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2002 at 10:34:09, Chris Beggy wrote:
> [...]
> > I think that I have gotten errors like this, in reading the .bbdb
> > file, when I have snarfed records with "face" in the buffer.
>
> We had a report on similar problems before.
> A
On Thursday, January 10, 2002 at 10:34:09, Chris Beggy wrote:
[...]
> I think that I have gotten errors like this, in reading the .bbdb
> file, when I have snarfed records with "face" in the buffer.
We had a report on similar problems before.
As far as I remember you have to edit .bbdb
by hand an
From: Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On , January 9, 2002 at 23:34:01, Galen Boyer wrote:
> > Invalid face text property value: red [12 times]
>
> Hmm, I think there is no face in BBDB which is red unless you
> defined/changed one yourself. Have you made any changes to the
> config/sources r
On , January 9, 2002 at 23:34:01, Galen Boyer wrote:
> I am continually getting the following type of message.
>
> Invalid face text property value: red [12 times]
Hmm, I think there is no face in BBDB which is red unless you
defined/changed one yourself. Have you made any changes to the
config/
16 matches
Mail list logo
