Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Why not write a hook into bbdb instead of depending on it? If BBDB
>> exists, it gets used by ecomplete, if not, no damage.
>
> Well, I really, really want a nice completion mode for Emacs. I think
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mark Plaksin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You've probably seen it already but in case you haven't, completion-ui.el
>> was just announced on gnu.emacs.sources. I haven't tried it but it sounds
>> good:
>> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-
Mark Plaksin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You've probably seen it already but in case you haven't, completion-ui.el
> was just announced on gnu.emacs.sources. I haven't tried it but it sounds
> good:
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/CompletionUI
The feature list looks great. :-)
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not write a hook into bbdb instead of depending on it? If BBDB
> exists, it gets used by ecomplete, if not, no damage.
Well, I really, really want a nice completion mode for Emacs. I think
it's embarrassing that Emacs users don't have completion like
Jochen Küpper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With respect to usability I haven't seen anything even close to bbdb,
> though.
It's a major piece of software. :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
---
On April 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Maybe re-writing bbdb "right" as part of Emacs might help. It seems
> like a bit of work, though.
Hey, be my guest. I've thought about it every so often, if only to
discard the amount of junk code that's probably only relevant to Emacs
18.59, but I know I'll
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with BBDB is that it's not included in Emacs (and
> apparently won't be, due to the copyright situation). So making
> ecomplete depend on/interact with BBDB seems like less than
> optimal...
Maybe re-writing bbdb "right" as part of
