R> That would be on account of the fact that C-o is not intended for
R> modifying to existing fields - it's intended for adding new ones.
Yes, but it's not like I use this thing every day. I need the
child-proof safety cap.
R> I may redo this at a future date, but for now you can use "e" to edit
On October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I love how if there are already Notes and you use ^o to make some
> more, bbdb queries you and waits until you are finished typing them in
> before razzing you with
> bbdb-insert-new-field: there already are notes!
That would be on account of the fact that C
Grr. Forgot the @cindex Bug Reports...
Alex.
*** bbdb.texinfo06 Aug 2003 11:06:01 +0200 1.51
--- bbdb.texinfo09 Oct 2004 00:28:20 +0200
***
*** 1046,1051
--- 1046,1052
@ref{Gnus Prep}. For usage details, see @ref{Gnus Features}. The field used
What do you think of the following patch?
*** bbdb.texinfo06 Aug 2003 11:06:01 +0200 1.51
--- bbdb.texinfo09 Oct 2004 00:27:01 +0200
***
*** 1046,1051
--- 1046,1052
@ref{Gnus Prep}. For usage details, see @ref{Gnus Features}. The field used
ca
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bbdb-insert-new-field: there already are notes!
> Well you could have told me earlier.
Indeed. Never noticed until now.
> Also there is no bug reporting item in that index.
That's true. I'll add something. The section Known Bugs doesn't tell
us anyt
On October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Also there should be a bbdb-report-bbdb-bug command.
>
There is. bbdb-submit-bug-report. It's been around for quite a while,
and it's terribly useful because it tells me, for example, what
version of emacs and BBDB you're using without which most bug report
