Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-25 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > As far as I know, pure unpatched RMAIL (in GNU Emacs) never had the > ability to display these in a readable form. People have patched it > in their personal versions to do a readable display. Ok, well, the reworking I'm doing will take whatever is displ

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-18 Thread Evil Boris
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm looking at a cleaner way around this, but I'm a little puzzled: > does rmail simply not decode these headers when it's displaying them? > I've put a test one into an RMAIL buffer here and it's displaying it > 'raw'. As far as I know, pure unpatched R

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-18 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have seen the msg from Adrian Lanz regarding RFC2047-encoded From: > > fields, a few months back. I have been using the following patch to > > bbdb.el for a couple of years, with no visible ill effects. Ulike

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-13 Thread Adrian Aichner
Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have seen the msg from Adrian Lanz regarding RFC2047-encoded From: > fields, a few months back. I have been using the following patch to > bbdb.el for a couple of years, with no visible ill effects. Ulike > Adrian's patch, mine decodes the From fields b