On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:34:19 +0200 Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
Robert> On Monday, April 12, 2004 at 10:58:02, Jochen Küpper wrote:
>> I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
>> bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
Robert> You want
onfigure
> bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
>
> ,[ C-h v bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all RET ]
> | bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all's value is
> | (("From" . "MAILER-DAEMON.*")
> | ("From" . "Mailer-Daemon.*")
> | (&qu
,
| GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (i686-pc-cygwin, X toolkit) of 2003-01-23 on DRACO
| No Gnus v0.2
| BBDB version 2.35 ($Date: 2004/03/22 15:23:33 $)
`
I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
,[ C-h v bbdb-auto-
On July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> I hear because it says so in the source and info files and the docstring
> for bbdb-notice-hook, but I've not tested it personally for some
> years. :)
Sorry, my bad. You are correct, of course.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very per
On July 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Keeping the default behavior is usually the best thing we
> can do and with Waiders and Gods help we did it more than
> once, but not if it:
More like Waider's interference and Robert's patience with same :)
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very p
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 11:47:26, Mats Lidell wrote:
> > Robert wrote:
>
> Robert> Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
> Robert> break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
> Robert> record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
>
> Isn't is possib
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Ronan Waide moaned:
> On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
>> so don't `benefit' from the caching).
>
> Not to be picky about it, but I'd prefer "it does" or "it doesn't"
> rather than "I hear". There's enough
On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
> so don't `benefit' from the caching).
Not to be picky about it, but I'd prefer "it does" or "it doesn't"
rather than "I hear". There's enough trickiness in BBDB as it stands
without adding rum
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ronan Waide moaned:
> One other thing that occurred to me that operates in this space is
> bbdb-notice-hook.
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe due to a blockage a
> Robert wrote:
Robert> Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
Robert> break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
Robert> record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
Isn't is possible to keep the default behavior when the address isn't
ignored?
Yours
course I don't want to have these addresses as records
>> in my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
>> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
>> '(
>> ("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")))
>> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
>> '
On July 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> 1) The point is: IF THERE IS ALREADY AN RECORD FOR THIS PERSON!
Ah, good point.
> 2) The change of bbdb-always-add-addresses's semantic allows
> NOT-SO-LISP-EXPERIENCED users to utilize the same hooks as
> for ignore-(some|all)-messages, i.e. all they need
On Thursday, July 24, 2003 at 16:25:44, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
> > break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
> > record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
> >
> > So have a look
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
> break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
> record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
>
> So have a look at this an vote for it or against ...
What does your patch do that, s
ing messages to
> > /dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses as
> > records in my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
> >
> > (setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
> > '(
> > ("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
es as records
> in my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
>
> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
> '(
> ("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")))
>
> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
> '(
> ("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECT
otes-ignore
'(
("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")))
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
'(
("From" . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")))
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work because BBDB asks me if I want
to add these addresses to my friends wh
17 matches
Mail list logo
