On July 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Question --- should bbdb-hooks just be loaded? Seems like it
> radically changes the behavior of some things in good ways Or
> perhaps selected items therein should be moved out and merged with the
> codebase proper?
Hmm. My autoloads file has a whole bu
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> IMHO, both RMail and MHE should also use bbdb-update-records,
> but I dare hacking them while being not able to test the
> changes. It would be great to have an active RMail/MHE user
> that joins as a BBDB developer.
I'll have a look at this and see if I
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 22:29:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Actually not, as they get called from bbdb-update-records
> > and that one cares for slightly different parameters, i.e.
> > promt-for-create is set to bbdb-prompt-for-create ...
>
> Ah. The reaso
On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Actually not, as they get called from bbdb-update-records
> and that one cares for slightly different parameters, i.e.
> promt-for-create is set to bbdb-prompt-for-create ...
Ah. The reason I asked was that your fix applies to the core bbdb
code, when perhaps
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 17:22:37, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 08:04:10, Vladimir G. Ivanovic
> > wrote:
> > > Robert,
> > >
> > > Works for me! Many thanks.
> >
> > Great, I'll commit that.
>
> Thanks for the fix, Robert, I'm
On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 08:04:10, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > Works for me! Many thanks.
>
> Great, I'll commit that.
Thanks for the fix, Robert, I'm just curious as to whether the gnus
and VM backends were also broken.
Cheers,
Wa
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 08:04:10, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Works for me! Many thanks.
Great, I'll commit that.
> And now, a plea to backport the VM & gnus enhancements to
> MH-E. Please.
> ;-)
Sorry, I don't have the time to setup MH (a creature I do
not no) in order to
Robert,
Works for me! Many thanks.
And now, a plea to backport the VM & gnus enhancements to MH-E. Please.
;-)
--- Vladimir
Vladimir G. Ivanovichttp://leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St.
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003 at 10:33:53, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> I set manually setq bbdb/mail-auto-create-p to 'prompt (the symbol),
> but it still didn't prompt. (I had used customize before.) I also
> tried 'bbdb-prompt-for-create and 'prompt-for-create but they too
> acted like
> t.
>
> T
> "VGI" == Vladimir G Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
VGI> Strange, I'm using BBDB 2.34 (with XEmacs 21.4.13).
VGI> bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist is defined in bbdb-hooks.el,
VGI> v1.5 dated 2002/02/12 22:56:38. Is this not what you have?
VGI> Have you tried using aprop
On July 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> If it's not operator error, let me know if you'd like me to submit a bug
> report.
I'll double-check the code, but please do submit a bug report using
bbdb-submit-bug-report. Please mention which mail client you're using,
too, as the problem may be in the c
I set manually setq bbdb/mail-auto-create-p to 'prompt (the symbol), but
it still didn't prompt. (I had used customize before.) I also tried
'bbdb-prompt-for-create and 'prompt-for-create but they too acted like
t.
The code in funtion bbdb-update-records in bbdb-com.el doesn't appear to
me to do
On July 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't think Robert's question was answered. He wants to ignore
> *specific* addresses, not all addresses. Try
>
>`bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist'
>
> An alist describing which messages *not* to automatically create
> BBDB records for. This on
I don't think Robert's question was answered. He wants to ignore
*specific* addresses, not all addresses. Try
`bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist'
An alist describing which messages *not* to automatically create
BBDB records for. This only works if bbdb/news-auto-create-p or
bbdb/ma
On July 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is there any way to tell BBDB to ignore specific from addresses?
> There are a bunch of auto-reply programs (e.g., from a bug-report or
> orders system) that persist in sending me email that purports to be
> from me (in terms of the name string), but with their
Is there any way to tell BBDB to ignore specific from addresses?
There are a bunch of auto-reply programs (e.g., from a bug-report or
orders system) that persist in sending me email that purports to be
from me (in terms of the name string), but with their email address.
I'd like BBDB to stop trying
16 matches
Mail list logo
