On Tue Jul 10 2012 Sam Steingold wrote:
> Until recently, I was not warned on such duplicates.
> The first loading of bbdb takes an extra second for each pair of dupes,
> so I have to wait for half a minute for bbdb to start.
Please read my mail "[BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-06-24"
As I said before
It
> * Roland Winkler [2012-07-10 10:06:50 -0500]:
>
> On Tue Jul 10 2012 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> > It appears that binding bbdb-allow-duplicates to t is the easiest
>> > solution here.
>>
>> Thanks. Is it seriously expected that one's internet acquaintances
>> should have unique names?
>
> From th
On Tue Jul 10 2012 Sam Steingold wrote:
> > It appears that binding bbdb-allow-duplicates to t is the easiest
> > solution here.
>
> Thanks. Is it seriously expected that one's internet acquaintances
> should have unique names?
>From the docstring of bbdb-allow-duplicates (which I did not change
> * Roland Winkler [2012-07-10 00:16:48 -0500]:
>
> On Sun Jul 8 2012 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> When I receive a "confirmation message" from "no-re...@foo.com",
>> I create a record and copy into its notes the url and all the relevant
>> information about the service I just registered for.
>> Since
On Sun Jul 8 2012 Sam Steingold wrote:
> When I receive a "confirmation message" from "no-re...@foo.com",
> I create a record and copy into its notes the url and all the relevant
> information about the service I just registered for.
> Since bbdb creates a record with first name "no-reply" and last
When I receive a "confirmation message" from "no-re...@foo.com",
I create a record and copy into its notes the url and all the relevant
information about the service I just registered for.
Since bbdb creates a record with first name "no-reply" and last name "",
loading the file becomes very slow be
