>
> In looking at your code, I'm a bit confused.
>
> First, why not just specify the included includes as comments?
You mean, as persistent includes? Well, persistent includes are more verbose,
and not needed unless you’re planning to update the. In this case, when I
update, the outermost
Neil,
In looking at your code, I'm a bit confused.
First, why not just specify the included includes as comments?
Second, why does your include change the doctype from invocation to
invocation?
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 5:17:16 AM UTC-7, Neil Faiman wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 12:13 AM,
