Another +1 for version control, subversion and Cornerstone.
The overhead disappears pretty quickly and soon you'll wonder how you
worked without it.
On Mar 31, 9:00 pm, Steve deRosier deros...@gmail.com wrote:
For the single user, you might investigate git. It's the scm used to
maintain the
Hi Steve,
Thank you for the thought and for elaborating on it for me. It sounds like
just what I need. For now at least, I don't need collaboration support and I
like the idea of aq work space right on my local machine.
Much appreciated,
Jack
Thanks Harold,
I am still researching and appreciate your thoughts.
Jack
On 3/31/09, Harold Tessmann III said ……
Jack Stewart ja...@amug.org typed something resembling:
snip
I use manual version management which is a
Thanks Carlton,
I find the notion of going to command line control of what is otherwise
sucha nice GUI, (OS X) very offputting. Do I need something like Versions in
addition to BBEdit?
Jack
On 3/31/09, Carlton Gibson said ……
On 31 Mar 2009, at
On 1 Apr 2009, at 07:55, Jack Stewart wrote:
I find the notion of going to command line control of what is
otherwise sucha nice GUI, (OS X) very offputting. Do I need
something like Versions in addition to BBEdit?
Hi Jack,
If you don't want to use the command line at all then you
On Apr 1, 2009, at 4:28 AM, steveax wrote:
On Mar 31, 9:00 pm, Steve deRosier deros...@gmail.com wrote:
For the single user, you might investigate git. It's the scm used to
maintain the Linux kernel. There's a few issues, it's conceptually
confusing and the tools are rather primitive, but
Any way to tweak that script so that if I've made a selection in a
document, it just converts the selection rather than the entire
document? (i.e. if selection, convert that, if no selection, convert
entire document).
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Nik wrote:
Thanks,
Yes, you're right, you can run CVS or SVN on local host. They even
have a local mode that allows you to go direct through the
filesystem instead of through a socket-based connection (though with
CVS I always use ssh connections, even on localhost, it makes being
mobile and working on network
There's an interview process for that...
--Kerri
On Apr 1, 2009 12:54 PM, dg d...@rexruff.com wrote:
LottoCal
You’re gonna be rich!
Oh, rich as in wealth, bummer. I was excited at first thinking I
could be Rich Siegel.
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Rich Siegel wrote: Hi all, We have a
On 4/1/09 at 8:54 AM, sie...@barebones.com (Rich Siegel) wrote:
Hi all,
We have a new product announcement today: LottoCal 1.0.
I downloaded it from the link Disk Image: (1.2TB) Download Now.
I can see from a quick look through the code (with BBEdit,
natch) that you've included the usual
On 09-04-01 at 19.39, kerri.hi...@gmail.com (Kerri Hicks) wrote:
There's an interview process for that...
:-D
--
Jan Erik Moström, http://mostrom.eu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk
On Apr 1, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Jack Stewart wrote:
Thank you for the thought and for elaborating on it for me. It
sounds like just what I need. For now at least, I don't need
collaboration support and I like the idea of aq work space right on
my local machine.
Jack,
This is fairly
When I try any operation on an existing repository, BBEdit becomes
unhappy...
I just installed SubVersion this weekend, so I am not sure why the
error message ?
Any ideas ?
### Wednesday, April 1, 2009 5:40:13 PM
Retrieving Revision Contents
svn: This client is too old to work with
On 2/04/2009 7:06 AM, Bruce Van Allen b...@cruzio.com spake thus:
the usual BBSW Ponies module
ZOMG PONIES!!!
:)
--
Nigel Stanger, http://www.business.otago.ac.nz/infosci/
Dept. of Information Science, http://xri.net/=nigel.stanger
University of Otago, Dunedin, NEW
Patrick,
Please read my message to Jack Stewart below...
Any Ideas ?
On Apr 1, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Jack Stewart wrote:
Thank you very much for taking so much time and trouble to lay out
your experience and thoughts on alternatives.
I do web development on a limited basis so am looking
On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Bill Hernandez wrote:
When I try any operation on an existing repository, BBEdit becomes
unhappy...
I just installed SubVersion this weekend, so I am not sure why the
error message ?
Any ideas ?
I think
On 4/1/09 at 2:06 PM, b...@cruzio.com (Bruce Van Allen) wrote:
I can see from a quick look through the code (with BBEdit, natch) that
you've included the usual BBSW Ponies module.
Alas, LottoCal will not help you play the ponies. However,
baseball fans will notice something special come
I looked a the long headers in Jack Stewart's messages, and compared
them to my messages, and the only difference I found was that his show :
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
and mine show :
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
So I tried :
[2009.01.04](06:15PM) - [roscoe] ~
... and a Happy April Fool's Day to you, too, Rich Siegel! :-)
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Rich Siegel wrote:
Hi all,
We have a new product announcement today: LottoCal 1.0. LottoCal
presents state lottery results for up to five days in advance
for your desired locations, as all-day
Well that didn't work...
The only other thing I noticed was that he is using gMail, and may be
bypassing some wrapping filter
I hope somebody figures this out. It would be nice to have mail that
didn't hardwrap...
Bill Hernandez
Plano, Texas
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Bill Hernandez
This is a message sent via gmail using the default settings to see
whether this long line is hard-wrapped at some point other than the
space right before the word space, which is where it got
soft-wrapped in the gmail composition box.
Chaz Larson - c...@jeck.com
At 18:50 -0500 4/1/09, Bill Hernandez wrote:
Well that didn't work...
The only other thing I noticed was that he is using gMail, and may be
bypassing some wrapping filter
I hope somebody figures this out. It would be nice to have mail that
didn't hardwrap...
Jack, if you're reading this, how
22 matches
Mail list logo
