Oh come on, explain! :)
-Russ
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:34 PM, John Kershaw wrote:
Find: amp;
Replace:
(You had to be there)
--
W: 01274 900801 H: 01274 581519 M: 07944 755613 www.kershaw.org/
john
skype:johnmkershaw AIM:johnkershaw MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:34 PM, John Kershaw wrote:
Find: amp;
Replace:
(You had to be there)
Oh come on, explain! :)
-Russ
I have no real idea, but I thought that maybe this was preceded by a
sequence of find/replaces that had the side effect of 'amp;amp;'s
being scattered all over the
Find: amp;
Replace:
On 10/3/06 at 4:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Jones) wrote:
Oh come on, explain! :)
Basically, the operation has no effect, because in the replacement
pattern means the entire match. So it replaced amp; with amp;.
nah, I think it arose when some nerds were acting
On 03 Oct 2006, at 13:34 , John Kershaw wrote:
Find: amp;
Replace:
That's funny. That would be goo on a t-shirt, if you wrote it right.
s/\amp;//g
And, to be pedantic, it's a sed joke, not a grep joke.
--
Oh and I could be a genius
if I just put my mind to it
And I, I could do anything
if
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:18:07 +0100, Google Kreme wrote
(in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
That's funny. That would be goo on a t-shirt, if you wrote it right.
Find: goo
Replace: good
You don't want goo on your t-shirt.
--
Patrick
--
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:53:54 +0100, Rich Siegel wrote
(in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:34 PM, John Kershaw wrote:
Find: amp;
Replace:
On 10/3/06 at 4:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Jones) wrote:
Oh come on, explain! :)
Basically, the operation has no effect,
