Re: bcm43xx_mac80211 not works on Compaq nx6110

2007-03-13 Thread Tomas Martisius
Good. This looks like success to me. Looks like sucess, but I am not very happy using bcm43xx softmac driver. That's why I'm testing bcm43xx-mac80211. For example why in rate auto speed does not goes up than 11M? :~# iwconfig wlan0 rate auto :~# iwconfig wlan0 wlan0 IEEE 802.11b/g

Re: bcm43xx_mac80211 not works on Compaq nx6110

2007-03-13 Thread Larry Finger
Tomas Martisius wrote: Good. This looks like success to me. Looks like sucess, but I am not very happy using bcm43xx softmac driver. That's why I'm testing bcm43xx-mac80211. For example why in rate auto speed does not goes up than 11M? Using a 4318, you are likely to be a lot happier with

Re: [bcm43xx] dhcp failure

2007-03-13 Thread Aleksander Trofimowicz
On 10/03/07, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason you are having trouble is that your AP has a NULL SSID. I'm not sure the bcm43xx-softmac combination will work. I know it does not if the ESSID is hidden. Are we talking about the same version of bcm43xx/softmac? I do successfully

Test framework

2007-03-13 Thread Aleksander Trofimowicz
I was wondering whether there exists a test framework/there is a need for automated tests, which could be run by everyone, without the knowledge what is exactly going on in bcm43xx development. What kind of test would be of any interest to you? Functional/performance blackbox tests? Coverage

Re: [bcm43xx] dhcp failure

2007-03-13 Thread Larry Finger
Aleksander Trofimowicz wrote: On 10/03/07, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason you are having trouble is that your AP has a NULL SSID. I'm not sure the bcm43xx-softmac combination will work. I know it does not if the ESSID is hidden. Are we talking about the same version of

Re: [RFT] [PATCH] bcm43xx: ACI fixes

2007-03-13 Thread Larry Finger
Stefano, As noted earlier on the list, I have started testing this patch. In setting the various interference modes, I have found some bugs in other places that were not previously tested. Thanks for this contribution. I have some comments below. Stefano Brivio wrote: Please test the