Re: [PATCH] ssb: Fix case where low-order board flags are unset

2008-04-19 Thread Stefanik Gábor
Oops, sorry. I did the previos patch by directly copypasting & editing Larry's patch, and apparently Gmail loves to whitespace-damage patches if HTML mode is enabled. I re-diffed it this time, and disabled HTML mode, so unless Gmail is having a *really* nasty day, it should be OK now. If it is stil

Re: [PATCH] ssb: Fix case where low-order board flags are unset

2008-04-19 Thread Michael Buesch
On Saturday 19 April 2008 16:53:10 Stefanik Gábor wrote: > Like this? Yeah, and then don't whitespace damage it and also add this to sprom_extract_r4(). Of course, you can also move it to sprom_extract(), so it will automatically be applied for any revision. I think that's actually the better idea

Re: [PATCH] ssb: Fix case where low-order board flags are unset

2008-04-19 Thread Stefanik Gábor
Like this? Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- John, This is 2.6.26 material. Larry --- Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/pci.c === --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ssb/pci.c

Re: [PATCH] ssb: Fix case where low-order board flags are unset

2008-04-19 Thread Michael Buesch
On Saturday 19 April 2008 05:49:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The specifications call for the low 16 bits of the board flags to > be cleared if unset (== 0x). This step was taken in bcm43xx, > but was missed when ssb was coded. This omission prevents Linksys > WMP11 cards with a BCM4301 from wo

[PATCH] ssb: Fix case where low-order board flags are unset

2008-04-18 Thread Larry . Finger
The specifications call for the low 16 bits of the board flags to be cleared if unset (== 0x). This step was taken in bcm43xx, but was missed when ssb was coded. This omission prevents Linksys WMP11 cards with a BCM4301 from working. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- John,