On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 17:02 -0400, David Reimer wrote:
According to their Product web page:
http://www.summitdatacom.com/specifications.htm#SDC-CF10G_802.11g_Compact_Flash_Module_with_Antenna_Connectors
it's a Broadcom BCM4318E.
Yeah, I just found that too and sent a mail to their
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:59 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I think I recall seeing a place in softmac where data messages from a foreign
AP are
dropped when associated, but I cannot locate it now. Can someone point me to
the proper place in the
code?
Softmac doesn't get to see data packets if
Peter Osterlund wrote:
Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter - does the interface work for a while, or does this transmit
timeout happen immediately?
It works perfectly for a few hours, then it stops working. Stressing
the network doesn't seem to make a difference. The only
Am Dienstag 05 September 2006 19:58 schrieb Larry Finger:
Based on user reports and my own experiences, the current problems with
NETDEV WATCHDOG tx timeouts, and the device just falling over do not happen
when periodic work is not preemptible. These problems seem to affect
BCM4306 rev 2 3
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:58, Larry Finger wrote:
Michael,
Based on user reports and my own experiences, the current problems with
NETDEV WATCHDOG tx timeouts,
and the device just falling over do not happen when periodic work is not
preemptible. These problems
seem to affect
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 20:12, Martin Langer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 04 September 2006 22:53, Martin Langer wrote:
This patch prints the ucode status to sysfs. Thanks to the reverse
engineers who made this patch possible.
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 15:18, Larry Finger wrote:
Emanuele Giaquinta wrote:
Raising BADNESS_LIMIT to 20 bcm43xx_voluntary_preempt produces a lot of
bcm43xx: ASSERTION FAILED (!in_atomic() !in_irq() !in_interrupt()
!irqs_disabled()) at:
I thought this was well known, but it has come up twice today.
If you want to use bcm43xx_SoftMAC, do _NOT_ use the code from Linville's
wireless-dev tree. It is
outdated!!! From that tree, use only bcm43xx-d80211. The correct tree for
softmac is the
wireless-2.6 tree of Linville.
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:54:22PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 20:12, Martin Langer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 04 September 2006 22:53, Martin Langer wrote:
This patch prints the ucode status to sysfs.
Hi,
I just want to note that I will continue development of
bcm43xx-d80211 in by git tree at git://bu3sch.de/wireless-dev.git
Please _DON'T_ pull this, if you are not interrested in
participating in development. Don't pull it just for fun to look
at the code. If you just want to take a quick
Michael Buesch wrote:
Simple: increasing badness limit makes the whole periodic work
non-preemptible. And we all know what happens if we call
schedule() in non-preemptible code (we hold the IRQ spinlock).
This assert() was added to prevent incorrect BADNESS_LIMIT tunings ;)
I wonder
11 matches
Mail list logo
