John W. Linville wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:33:01AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
A typo in the specs interchanges the branches in an if statement, which
breaks operations for a BCM4306/rev 2 that has phy-analog == 1.
@@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@ void bcm43xx_phy_set_baseband_attenuatio
Michael,
When I try the -mb tree on my old i386 notebook, I get an irq 11: nobody cared
message and interrupts for the bcm43xx-mac80211 device are not initialized. The
code in Linville's tree works. The only difference that seems to be important
is the code returned when a shared interrupt not
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:33:01AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
A typo in the specs interchanges the branches in an if statement, which
breaks operations for a BCM4306/rev 2 that has phy-analog == 1.
@@
On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:03:04 Larry Finger wrote:
Michael Buesch wrote:
Last time I checked this code it matched the specs. And that's not too
long ago.
Did the specs change?
We had a complaint that a change in the V3 specs broke a BCM4306/rev 2 card
using bcm43xx - it
Michael Buesch wrote:
Last time I checked this code it matched the specs. And that's not too
long ago.
Did the specs change?
We had a complaint that a change in the V3 specs broke a BCM4306/rev 2 card
using bcm43xx - it
received but did not transmit. I verified the breakage and found that
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:33:01AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
A typo in the specs interchanges the branches in an if statement, which
breaks operations for a BCM4306/rev 2 that has phy-analog == 1.
@@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@ void bcm43xx_phy_set_baseband_attenuatio
hello, i have some problem with the ap mode:
first i have a problem compiling hostapd 0.6.0 against the curent
wireless-dev kernel:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium-m -pipe -DHOSTAPD_DUMP_STATE
-I../src -I../src/crypto -I../src/utils -I../src/common
-I/usr/include/madwifi
Michael Buesch wrote:
I neither think this is the correct solution, nor do I think that this
is the way bcm43xx-softmac does it. This would always return HANDLED, right?
regardless if the IRQ was for bcm43xx or not. I _do_ think that the bug is
in the driver sharing the IRQ with bcm43xx.
On Thursday 26 July 2007 21:26:01 John W. Linville wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:49:58PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
Hmmm...well, if you asked to revert it on bcm43xx, why is it appropriate
here?
AFAIK, the V4 specs have always had the typo, thus there
On Thursday 26 July 2007 18:33:01 Larry Finger wrote:
A typo in the specs interchanges the branches in an if statement, which
breaks operations for a BCM4306/rev 2 that has phy-analog == 1.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
John and Michael,
This patch is made for the
A typo in the specs interchanges the branches in an if statement, which
breaks operations for a BCM4306/rev 2 that has phy-analog == 1.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
John and Michael,
This patch is made for the wireless-dev tree after the bcm43xx-mac80211
directory has been
John W. Linville wrote:
Hmmm...well, if you asked to revert it on bcm43xx, why is it appropriate here?
AFAIK, the V4 specs have always had the typo, thus there was no patch
introducing this error - it is
original. On the other hand, the V3 specs were modified fairly late in the
process,
12 matches
Mail list logo
