Re: [PATCH RFT/RFC] b43: Add QOS support

2008-02-13 Thread Johannes Berg
Hm, it seems there are two other variables in SHM we should probably write: 0x000E EDCF Status Offset I'll have to double-check that. 0x0030 TXF Current Index I don't think we need to write that, it's used internally by the ucode to manage the queues. johannes signature.asc

Re: [PATCH RFT/RFC] b43: Add QOS support

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Buesch
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 13:07:53 Johannes Berg wrote: + if (queue = ARRAY_SIZE(wl-qos_params)) { + /* Queue not available or don't support setting +* params on this queue. Return success to not +* confuse mac80211. */ + return 0; +

Re: [PATCH RFT/RFC] b43: Add QOS support

2008-02-13 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 13:14 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: On Wednesday 13 February 2008 13:07:53 Johannes Berg wrote: + if (queue = ARRAY_SIZE(wl-qos_params)) { + /* Queue not available or don't support setting + * params on this queue. Return success to not +

Re: [PATCH RFT/RFC] b43: Add QOS support

2008-02-13 Thread Johannes Berg
Hm, it seems there are two other variables in SHM we should probably write: 0x000E EDCF Status Offset Ok already mentioned this on IRC but for the record: this is set by the initial value upload. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[PATCH] b43: Add HostFlags HI support

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Buesch
This adds support for the high 16 bits of the hostflags. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- John, this is for 2.6.26. Index: wireless-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h === ---