On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211.c
@@ -3030,9 +3030,10 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_data(struct ieee80211_txrx_data *rx)
memcpy(dst, hdr-addr1, ETH_ALEN);
memcpy(src, hdr-addr3, ETH_ALEN);
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 02:52:56AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211.c
@@ -3030,9 +3030,10 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_data(struct ieee80211_txrx_data *rx)
memcpy(dst,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:02:12AM -0700, Michael Wu wrote:
This doesn't seem quite right. I think ieee80211_rx_h_data is a safer place
for this check (inside the IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS case), and allows various
statistics to be updated. ieee80211_rx_h_sta_process is another function that
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 20:55 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
I hacked-up the (untested) patch below -- thoughts?
I tried to test it. Today, I get no connectivity with bcm43xx-mac80211
(from Fedora 7 + your patch).
It does manage to associate, but tcpdump shows it doesn't seem to
receive any
On Friday 03 August 2007, Daniel Drake wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
My experience is that mac80211 is broken w.r.t IPv6 -- it receives its
own packets. It would be suboptimal for me if the softmac version of
bcm43xx were to go away before that got fixed.
This may be a stack-level issue.
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:30 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
This may be a stack-level issue. This is one of the issues holding back
zd1211rw-mac80211 going into mainline: we have a report that
zd1211rw-softmac works fine with IPv6 but mac80211 only works
occasionally with the same device on the
David Woodhouse wrote:
My experience is that mac80211 is broken w.r.t IPv6 -- it receives its
own packets. It would be suboptimal for me if the softmac version of
bcm43xx were to go away before that got fixed.
This may be a stack-level issue. This is one of the issues holding back
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:30 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
This may be a stack-level issue. This is one of the issues holding back
zd1211rw-mac80211 going into mainline: we have a report that
zd1211rw-softmac works fine with
