Hi Sander,
On 30/05/16 15:48, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing
>> plenary session.
>
> Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community
> statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is
Hi,
> Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing
> plenary session.
Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community
statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is that
they wanted a stronger statement :) Ruediger Volk
Hi Jan,
> Since I can't find Benno *and* there are voices of support *and* this
> stuff needs to be presented tomorrow morning I will dare to call a
> consensus.
>
> I think that the text in current form is a good message.
Great! In that case I will submit it for the closing plenary right now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 26/05/16 17:32, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Yes, it is ok with me.
>
> Thanks
>
>> I might suggest adding a sentence:
>>
>> ... can built their future on. It is not sustainable to build an
>> IPv4-only network today. The only way to
