Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread SBruno75
yeah, I believe that...wanna by a bridge??? sstorch

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Eric Myren
I grow weary of Orwellion philosophy , external power is so boring , it is always the same... On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 06:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, I believe that...wanna by a bridge??? sstorch

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread mroboz
I think he means the Peace Bridge at Windsor, ON. Michael - Original Message - From: Allan Balliett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 6:43 AM Subject: Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this: yeah, I believe

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Essie Hull
Actually, I think that Steve meant the Brooklyn Bridge. For eons, it has represented gullability (I have this bridge for sale at just the right price...). Essie At 12:19 PM 02/09/03 -0500, you wrote: It would have to be the Canadian Peace Bridge, wherever it is located, because American

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Bob Thorson
At 12:31 PM -0500 2/9/03, Essie Hull wrote: Actually, I think that Steve meant the Brooklyn Bridge. For eons, it has represented gullability (I have this bridge for sale at just the right price...). Essie Yes, that was obvious several layers of meaning ago. Are you saying that anyone

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Essie Hull
Bob- I was just giving my take on the bridge reference. I've not examined the website in any detail. Perhaps Steve has. Essie At 12:45 PM 02/09/03 -0500, you wrote: At 12:31 PM -0500 2/9/03, Essie Hull wrote: Actually, I think that Steve meant the Brooklyn Bridge. For eons, it has

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Leigh Hauter
And yes it is true that Al Qaeda was heavily involved in the terrorist war against the Serbs as stated in Allan's post. And yes Clinton and Albright did side with the Islamic terrorists as part of breaking up Yugoslavia for the benefit of the Euro. They conducted a high altitude bombing of

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread SBruno75
In a message dated 2/9/03 12:27:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, I think that Steve meant the Brooklyn Bridge. For eons, it has represented gullability (I have this bridge for sale at just the right price...). Essie Bingo, that means you're right...sstorch

Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Allan Balliett
Where was the Hollywood peace movement then? Oh, then it was Clinton's war. Never Clinton's war. John F. Kennedy learned the hard way to not interfere with the machinations of America's secret armies. Clinton was another. Years ago, During a live broadcast from a black histroy event a

RE: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread zoran
Allan That was Serbia not Iraq Zoran -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allan Balliett Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 11:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

RE: In light of the Heightened Security State here in the Homeland, read this:

2003-02-09 Thread Allan Balliett
Allan That was Serbia not Iraq Zoran Thanks, Zoran, I admit that I don't pay enough attention to the horrors. -Allan