In a message dated 7/28/02 11:58:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had been running the lower well stuff (BC,
500, WHC) all night and then the upper well (501 ,508 ) only for two hours
of a morning as I believed that doing these all day was clearing the clouds
away.
Sorry, but Horsetail is
Hi! Lloyd
It was Hugh Lovel that introduced the concept of using Horsetail to stop
perception. He has his Fieldbroadcaster users put the Horsetail in when there is
a risk of frost, as frost is the result of freezing dew, no dew, no frost, at
least for three or so degrees below freezing. I have
Pam DeTray wrote:
Did you buy the potentizer to make your own reagents?
Thanks.
Pam DeTray
What is this potentiser. Is it a two well radionics box or similiar???
Is it portable. I imagine this might solve my problems of manifesting
essences while travelling and the need for a lab.
Glen A
Sounds great Lloyd, do you have an address for purchase?
I am liking the imaginations of its potential and I look forward to
experimenting with one
Thanks
Glen
Lloyd Charles wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glen Atkinson
What is this potentiser Is it a two well radionics box or
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Pam DeTray wrote:
Did you buy the potentizer to make your own reagents?
Thanks.
Pam DeTray
What is this potentiser. Is it a two well radionics box or similiar???
Is it portable. I imagine this might solve my problems
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Hi James: I'll try to keep it short. I started using the FB in May 2000, at
first I had no idea how to use it, beyond how I used the cosmic pipe it
replaced.
-
From: jsherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 1 March 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Hi David,
I guess in my haste around the radionics material, I must have missed the
difference btwn. the FB and the cosmic pipe which I thought was an FB
policing?
Until next time,
Sincere regards
James Hedley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Glen -
You present concerns that Peter Tompkins expressed to me a couple of
years back. Peter is so concerned about
Message -
From: D S Chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
I agree with all that has been said about the dangers, BUT if we untrained
suckers don't do it who will? Do we all sit back and await
In a message dated 2/17/02 4:11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes in the US its a dead word and Gils comment stands, elswhere it is
what we the practioners make it and the Associations are just monuments
to certain individuals egos and near on irrelevant except to a fanatical
few.
Im for
In a message dated 2/17/02 4:11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes in the US its a dead word and Gils comment stands, elswhere it is
what we the practioners make it and the Associations are just monuments
to certain individuals egos and near on irrelevant except to a fanatical
few.
Im
Thanks Lloyd,
That makes much more sense.
I have a lot of problems with a Laboratory attached to Sales Organisation and I
would also have a lot of difficulty with the use of Radionics in this area. When
I am doing soil reclamation work, that requires a Lab Test, I use one of two
Labs, then pay a
I wish you'd comment on this info a bit more. What intentional particles?
And intention--who's and how to counteract this?
Hi All -
I would first observe that, from the point of view of Western Tropical
astrology, both Uranus (Cosmic Shakti) and Neptune (Cosmic Waters) are in
the dry, yang
18, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Gil
I support your concerns here. The little amount of playing around with
my pipe tells me it is a very powerful instrument that can very easily
be abused, consciously or unconsciously. And my experiements with the BD
preps show me
: Radionics (Drought update)
how does this new information jive with the growing
belief among growers that tiny manmade airborne particles are being
intentionally released in the atmosphere?
Most uncomfortably, I should say. - S
Steven McFadden
Chiron Communications
7 Avenida
I wish you'd comment on this info a bit more. What intentional particles?
And intention--who's and how to counteract this?
Jane - I talk to farmer regularly - particularly farmers in
California's Central Valley - who believe that the u.s. airforce is
depositing small particles of aluminum in
At 09:52 PM 2/14/02 +1100, James and Barbara wrote:
This proposition is backed up by the use of Sai Baba's Sanjeevini healing
cards that can be downloaded from his web page.
Would you please send me the web address - I can't seem to locate the cards.
Thanks,
Essie Hull
Hi Gil --- Yeah I did it again eh -- garbled my message!
I was referring to the use of radionic analysis to build
physical fertiliser programs which is a bit outside of BD but common
practice in eco farming circles. When we couple this with the situation of
commission sales or
This just in - research on disturbed rain patterns worldwide. Sigh, Steven
New satellite data shows tiny airborne particles are changing rainfall
patterns around the world, researchers said Sunday.
The man-made particles, mostly from burning fossil fuels, make it more
difficult for clouds to
So, Steve, et al, how does this new information jive with the growing
belief among growers that tiny manmade airborne particles are being
intentionally released in the atmosphere?
-Allan
This just in - research on disturbed rain patterns worldwide. Sigh, Steven
New satellite data shows
Hi! Jane, Hugh and the List.
I agree with your concerns about some one driving a Cosmic Pipe or other
Radionic Device and putting out energy other than that which is desired.
I could make your skin crawl with stories about inappropriate use and
miss use
of these devices. That is one of the
Thanks Allan,
Points taken.
As I said, I do not understand how there can be a basis in Law, by which one can do
that. The term was in general use in many countries long before the trademark was
issued, thus in any Law System based on either Common Law or Statue Law, could not
Trademark it.
- Original Message -
From: Gil Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics Accreditation
Dear Gil and list -- My remarks here are to be taken as only applying to
experimental use of radionics in agriculture
Gil
I support your concerns here. The little amount of playing around with
my pipe tells me it is a very powerful instrument that can very easily
be abused, consciously or unconsciously. And my experiements with the BD
preps show me they are also very powerful and can create chaos if used
Gil,
The Sanjeevini cards are awesome. Thank you to you and James and Barbara
Hadley for bringing them to my (and other list members') attention.
There is nothing that would indicate to me that these prayers are anything
but pure. And yet I have the hardest time reconciling these with the
Glen -
You present concerns that Peter Tompkins expressed to me a couple of
years back. Peter is so concerned about the misuse of eloptic energy
that he will neither towers of power nor cosmic pipes on his
property. He also expressed concern for what would become of mankind
if radionics was
Hi! Virginia,
The Sanjeevini cards are awesome.
I recognise your concern about things that have been reported about Sai Baba. I
to do not know what to make of it. I have read the material in Nexus and in
several Web Sites. I know a number of people who have been drawn to him and
made the big
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
- Original Message -
From: Gil Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Radionics Accreditation
Dear Gil and list -- My remarks here are to be taken as only applying
Hugh Lovel wrote: Snip:- I'm not comfortable with calling myself biodynamic if it
means I become associated with the kind of behavior Demeter has shown. I don't want
to be branded with the nomenclature of a stuck-up insular cult.
I am with you.
Gil
No, but all this shows is that BD organisations are out of touch with
the true wholism of Biodynamics. And so be it.
This is a point often made on this list.
Glen
Gil Robertson wrote:
Glen Atkinson wrote: I d like to suggest BD is a complete system and the
above
are just part of it.
You
It was written,
So why not use Radionic Devices and do it from the comfort of the office?
This is what worries (for lack of a better way of putting it) the more
archaic folk.
Why not put your love for your kids in a radionic device and do so from the
comfort of the office?
It seems to me that
I truly do not mean to bash anyone. It is just a shame to see such a
wonderful concept turn into
such bickering, anger and the need to prove or put down.
Just for the record, Chris, I missed the anger and bickering that
seems to have disturbed you. I've just seen Gil, Glen, Hugh, Jane, et
al
Please Forward. Thanks.
I truly do not mean to bash anyone. It is just a shame to see such a
wonderful concept turn into
such bickering, anger and the need to prove or put down.
Dear Chris, Allan, Hugh, Glen, et al,
Well, that's one opinion. Everyone has one. We all tend to see things
through
Hugh Lovel wrote: Snip - To me the best thing that has happened to Steiner's work
is that Demeter (Anne Mendenhall) has said We own the term biodynamic and we
control its use. Now if you want to really use Steiner's ideas in freedom you
have to go beyond the term biodynamic.
I do not understand
Allan Balliett wrote: Snip - Folks, be polite by all means, and, yes,
inhabit a living a prayer, but please don't allow yourself to be ashamed
to share a divergent opinion, or a heartfelt question.
Here here,
Gil
HUGH wrote..
Yes point taken. In the US the term Biodynamics is owned by an
organisation and thus they can define it. Here in NZ it is a generic
word and one of its meaning is 'a agricultural system based on the
indications of RS'. Which according to my reading allows for all things
Hi! Virginia,
Thank you for sharing your experiences. There are so many stories of people
taking responsibility for there patch without chemicals and I am very interested
in the concept of being able to control precipitation and evaporation. I flew
over many deserts on my way to England and found
I guess I didn't understand what this meant until this post for which I
thank you all. Having been an artist in my previous incarnation in this
life, paper is something I could get excited about. Now blessed water by
paper...wow! I'm ready! I always suspected there must be some really good
Gil Robertson wrote
While BD is the best Ag System we have to date. It is at this time, not
a
complete system. We also have to consider Paramagnetics, water
restructuring,
mineral balance, clay spreading, gypsum spreading, ameliorating salinity
etc.
The delivering of BD to large
Thanks for your explanation Markess. I was unfamiliar with the term
conings as you had assumed.
As for radionics, I am a bit surprised that you (of course I don't know you
so I'm not sure why I am surprised...) use a radionic device. I am NOT a bd
purist, or purist of any kind. However, my
Gil Robertson wrote:
While BD is the best Ag System we have to date. It is at this time, not
a
complete system. We also have to consider Paramagnetics, water
restructuring,
mineral balance, clay spreading, gypsum spreading, ameliorating salinity
etc.
I d like to suggest BD is a complete
PM
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
From: jsherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:37:05 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
But I do believe the
human body is the perfect radionic instrument.
Blessings
Glen Atkinson wrote: I d like to suggest BD is a complete system and the above
are just part of it.
You are welcome to do so, but can you show me a BD registering organisation
that includes them in their requirements?
Gil
update)
From: jsherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:37:05 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
But I do believe the
human body is the perfect radionic instrument.
Blessings,
Jane
Quoting John Trudell the other
,
I'll let ya know.
Blessings on good work, with or without radionic devices.
Jane
- Original Message -
From: Gil Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Hi! Jane,
Radionics is a formalization
What you say is true of, I believe, any device used to transfer the subtle energies...pendulum, whatever. The instrument is needed for focus, and, after a while, beings will attend to aid the work. Do you know of anyone carrying Drown's work forward? Also, have you ever heard of Oscar Brunler?
instrument.Blessings,Jane- Original Message -From: "Wayne and Sharon McEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:49 AMSubject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)Jane -- please read on.Moen Creek wrote:Deva of Light Expression
Title: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Good old web sez,
http://www.chirobase.org/12Hx/drown.html
This article originally appeared in the April 1968 issue of Today's Health, a magazine published by the American
Medical Association. During the 1960s and 1970s, the author investigated and wrote
do believe the
human body is the perfect radionic instrument.
Blessings,
Jane
- Original Message -
From: Wayne and Sharon McEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Jane -- please read
Title: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Gil,
please expound further on
The really powerful systems in use currently are paper based. Here
in Oz, Frank Moody found that the circuit of an instrument, would work as well
as the physical instrument, in the hands of a trained practitioner. He later
Re: Drown. The line of Radionic training that I had and will teach is directly
down line from Ruth Drown. She did major development work, taking the Abrams
concepts and making major simplifications to the instruments. From something
that took at least two strong men to carry, she came up with
Moen Creek wrote: Gil, Please expound further on
The really powerful systems in use currently are paper based. Here in
Oz, Frank Moody found that the circuit of an instrument, would work as
well as the physical instrument, in the hands of a trained practitioner.
He later developed this further
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)
Hi! Jane,
Radionics is a formalization of a number of closely related energetic
Jane -- please read on.
Moen Creek wrote:
Jane, I'll take the moderately simple Q first.
what do you mean by "conings"?
Fran's training come through the Perelandra work. She calls in higher
selves, spirit guides, the White Brotherhood, leaves room for participants
to ask in their personals
Hi! Jane,
Radionics is a formalization of a number of closely related energetic
methodologies. Radionics traces it's history over a similar period as BD. There
are a number of schools of thought in Radionics and some do not speak to others.
Radionics ranges from the very complex to the very
That was the site I have forwarded to the list
about a week ago.
Jose
Hi Folks!
I must admit that I am losing track here a little bit -- anyway, I found
this website
that shows how to build a cloudbuster so that you can compare notes. Any
further
comparative notes would be appreciated.
James DeMeo's Orgone Biophysical Research Lab homepage is at
http://www.saharasia.org/index.htm
Lot's of useful information there, and, of course, things to buy.
I recollect from my own reading (but cannot site the publications
right now) that in the Reichian literature there are many
DeMeo has a publication called something like So You want to Build a
Cloudbuster that used to be available at his website. There are also
warnings in the Orgone Accumulator Handbook -Allan
Allan you wrote: My plans for a home accumulator were set aside
after reading DeMeo's
warnings.
please
Reichian Cloudbuster had indeed a design problem
which is claimed to be solved in this new design in
http://www.metatech.org/cloudbuster__orgone_generator.html
I am building a half size model but not sure if the modification
will render it ineffective.
Jose
James DeMeo's Orgone Biophysical
Hi Folks!
I must admit that I am losing track here a little bit -- anyway, I found this website
that shows how to build a cloudbuster so that you can compare notes. Any further
comparative notes would be appreciated.
http://www.metatech.org/
Peace...
Wayne
Title: Re: Drought update
Allan you wrote: My plans for a home accumulator were set aside after reading DeMeo's
warnings.
please delineate where you found a warning by DeMeo.
Was he referencing the one outlined on
http://www.metatech.org/cloudbuster__orgone_generator.html
Thanks
Markess
Title: Re: Drought update
I'd like to hear about more people who are doing things like this.
-Allan
Allan, we have a chemtrail buster as specked (sp?) on http://www.metatech.org/cloudbuster__orgone_generator.html
It has been operating in our driveway since mid Oct 2001.
A dear friend BD
3 inches of rain in last 24 hours, ah life is good!
David C
The dynamics of drought are very interesting.
The Dor Buster was very dangerous to use as it resulted in the Dor being
channelled back to the device. With what we are doing and Hugh Lovel,
who gave me the idea, does, is clearing the Dor, or what ever it is
that is stopping precipitation and
64 matches
Mail list logo
