The market picks it. We typically use what we can buy. It can change from one
production build to the next.
This happens all the time on the Hardware world. That is why the SW has to be
ready to handle all of them.
Gerald
From: beagleboard@googlegroups.com
On Sep 3, 2017 3:32 PM, "William A. Mills" wrote:
Thanks Gerald. I did find the change sheet after a bit.
When you have alternatives like the Kingston vs Micron for eMMC and DDR
parts, who picks which one is used? The manufacturer (PTI)? Can it change
from one
Thanks Gerald. I did find the change sheet after a bit.
When you have alternatives like the Kingston vs Micron for eMMC and DDR
parts, who picks which one is used? The manufacturer (PTI)? Can it change
from one production run to another? Or do you dictate when that happens
and potentially
The BOM has a revision page with the changes for each revision. We addd some
new par tnumbers for some alternate sources due to some obsolete parts a while
back. But that was it. Nothing in the design itself changed.
From: beagleboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:beagleboard@googlegroups.com] On
... or I could just look at the "changes" sheet in the BOM excel!
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:10 PM, William A. Mills
wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> Thanks. If that is all it is, then no hurry on the Rev C schematics.
> Jason can just put a note on the wiki &| the github files stating
Gerald,
Thanks. If that is all it is, then no hurry on the Rev C schematics.
Jason can just put a note on the wiki &| the github files stating as much.
I am currently trying to diff the BOMs. diff is useless so it looks like I
will have to write a script.
Thanks,
Bill
--
For more
Yes, I can confirm that.
Rev C schematic is the same as the Rev B1 except for the processor revision.
I will create a Rev C schematic for you. I need to change the revision on each
page and add a 2.0 to the schematic symbols. That will not however, affect the
netlist.
Once I get this done,
Hello,
Now that BB-X15 Rev C is shipping in decent quantities, can we get an
update to elinux wiki? The last status update was February. [1]
I saw that Jason added the RevC2 BOM to the x15 github project. [2]
I also saw Robert say that RevC was basically the same as Rev B expect with
the 2.0
Could you post a picture or drawing of your physical layout? I think the
evidence points to interference from the PWM circuit into the XBee. HOw
close physically are they?
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:18 PM, wrote:
> Just tried adding the 1uF decoupling capacitor in parallel with
The current download link for the BeagleBoard-X15 Debian Stretch download
is broken. It links to
"https://debian.beagleboard.org/images/bbx15-debian-9.0-lxqt-4gb-armhf-2017-07-02-4gb.img.xz;
which returns "404 not found"
I did a bit of browsing in the beagleboard.org/images directory and
10 matches
Mail list logo