There are different Compilers for Starterware and Linux. When I set the
flag -mfpu=vfpv3 in Linux, and Rebuild the project I don't get a different
result. What I can do in eclipse under Linux is to set the optimizations
level. What I did yesterday was to change my programm to the following:
Here my results:
1. I changed my programm loop to the following integer calculations:
int i;
int a = 0;
int b = 23210
for(i = 0; i35000; i++)
{
a = a + b;
}
With that i got a frequency of 413 Hz with Starterware and 420 Hz with
Linux. So finally a comparable result. The
On 5/5/2014 3:28 AM, Thomas Laudan wrote:
Running the Starterware program on debug mode, I measured 870 Hz and in
Linux 900 Hz. Running Starterware on release mode, I even measured 1,1 kHz.
So doing float calculations without math-Functions, I finally get a
comparable result. But still
Oh damn you're right. I didn't turn on the FPU. I should have read this
first:
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/StarterWare_NeonVFP
What I will do now:
First I will change my programm by doing integer calculations instead of
float/double and repeat my comparison between Linux and
Hi there,
I am testing the performance of the beaglebone in combination with the
no-OS Starterware from TexasInstruments and with the Linux Distribution
Angström.
My test program, which I wrote for both for Starterware and Linux, does the
following: I configure GPIO_1_28 as an output pin
On 4/25/2014 4:52 AM, thomas5...@gmx.de wrote:
So I also integrated the functions MMUConfigEnable() and
CacheEnable(CACHE_ALL) into my program. It kind of worked, my new results
for Starterware:
T = 500 ms
But still !!! 500 times slower than on Linux.
Did anyone make similar
