Re: [beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-20 Thread TJF
lazarman schrieb am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 um 23:02:58 UTC+2: > ... maybe TJF will reply. Hi Bruce, beside 2x8k DRam and 12k SRam libpruio is using a further memory block called ERam (extension or external), find details at

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-18 Thread 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard
#saw one post on the TI E2E forum that indicated #that Remoteproc/RPMSG is not intended to be a #fast data transfer mechanism.   That was by a TI #engineer I think. In a parallel processing architect that ability to share data quickly between processors is paramount.With out that the ARM is

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-18 Thread 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard
@TJF on this forum promotes a solution called libpruio that might work.  I don't know if it's fast enough though. I thought libprio was designed to be very fast was my understanding. I Saw in TI forum docs that UIO isn't supported in SDK Linux by TI.  I would definitely agree with below and your

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-18 Thread Walter Cromer
Regardless of the timing, you want to store 20,000 values but I think you've calculated correctly that you can only store 7,168 values in the 28k of combined PRU memory and that would only be true if some of the PRU memory wasn't used by your PRU program when it's loaded. So are you trying to

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-17 Thread 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard
Hello  Google Am335x  PRU Support package it's got 6 labs and examples including ADC. It's written for the SDK Linux  Dennis mentioned but people have gotten these examples to work with Linux supported in this group There's also a Support package tar  containing step by step HTML of all the labs

[beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-17 Thread Dennis Lee Bieber
On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT), in gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Bruce Chidester wrote: > Not sure I am replying properly to preserve the format desired for this >page, but your (Dennis B) response definitely deserves a response from me. Difficult -- somehow your

[beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-17 Thread Bruce Chidester
Not sure I am replying properly to preserve the format desired for this page, but your (Dennis B) response definitely deserves a response from me. On Monday, May 17, 2021 at 12:39:53 PM UTC-5 Dennis Bieber wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2021 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT), in >

[beagleboard] Re: Shared PRU Memory and beyond

2021-05-17 Thread Dennis Lee Bieber
On Mon, 17 May 2021 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT), in gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Bruce Chidester wrote: >This leaves me with a total memory of 28K. Storing float's I can store >7,168 values. I would like to capture 20,000 values in about 250ms. Capture from what? 80