Hello AMF
I have 5 year old quad core win 8.1 64 bit 8 G ram laptop running Ubuntu 16.04
VM I used it to build SDK kernel no problems and
a new Debian 10 VM with a 64 bit GCC on same machine. The Debian VM is flaky
last attempt I just got memory calloc error on building 5.5 TI BSP from the
Hi lazarman,
on ubuntu 20.04, this builds ok
git clone https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev.git
cd ti-linux-kernel-dev
git checkout remotes/origin/ti-linux-rt-5.4.y -b ti-linux-rt-5.4.y
./build_kernel.sh
I've used VirtualBox before with Ubuntu 16/18/20 without any issues, what
> Be nice not keep downloading the 2G kernel source I know there is a
> rebuild.sh but I am assuming that is used after a successful build
> If these instruction need I tweek I can understand I can test them. If it old
> and not supported a heads up would be appreciated. So I need something
I decided to make another attempt a clean dir on Mainline 5.4 I was blocked.
No password . That was not there before
I guess I will take a break
Linux Kernel
This script will build the kernel, modules, device tree binaries and copy them
to the deploy directory.
Mainline
|
|
|
| | |
Hello
I've failed to build following those instructions twice in Mainline and twice
using the TI BSP.version. the 2nd attempt of TI BSP is hung as we speak after
resolving dependencies for several hours. Each attempt takes hours and the
build_kernel script doesnt care you already cloned 2G
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:53 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:45 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:41 PM Mark Lazarewicz wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks!!
> > >
> > > Think of it as I'm validating the instructions I think having these is
> > > something
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:45 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:41 PM Mark Lazarewicz wrote:
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > Think of it as I'm validating the instructions I think having these is
> > something good. Unfortunately my VM blew up just now.
> >
> > I KNOW your adamant
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:41 PM Mark Lazarewicz wrote:
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Think of it as I'm validating the instructions I think having these is
> something good. Unfortunately my VM blew up just now.
>
> I KNOW your adamant about not supporting VM.
>
> So I'll build a dedicated Debian 8 dev box.
Thanks!!
Think of it as I'm validating the instructions I think having these is
something good. Unfortunately my VM blew up just now.
I KNOW your adamant about not supporting VM.
So I'll build a dedicated Debian 8 dev box.
Any hints tips lessons learned what you use be appreciated.
Have a great
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:19 PM 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard <
beagleboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks Robert
>
> I love these instructions very well done
> my goal is to be able to build something stable from scratch not drop
> binaries maybe modify kernel add drivers be self
Thanks Robert
I love these instructions very well done
my goal is to be able to build something stable from scratch not drop binaries
maybe modify kernel add drivers be self sufficient at building everything and
manually updating SD card as opposed to using an upgrade/update on the BB black.
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:54 PM Robert Nelson
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robert Nelson
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:39 PM 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard <
>> beagleboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dumb question by a Debian Newb
>>>
>>> I am following
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:45 PM Robert Nelson
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:39 PM 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard <
> beagleboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Dumb question by a Debian Newb
>>
>> I am following this now Debian: Getting Started with the BeagleBone Black
>>
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:39 PM 'Mark Lazarewicz' via BeagleBoard <
beagleboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dumb question by a Debian Newb
>
> I am following this now Debian: Getting Started with the BeagleBone Black
>
Dumb question by a Debian Newb
I am following this now Debian: Getting Started with the BeagleBone Black
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Debian: Getting Started with the BeagleBone Black
This is a page about TI's Cortex-A8 based; BeagleBone Black. Availability
Boards: BeagleBone Black at
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:53 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:51 PM Robert Nelson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:47 PM Bruce Chidester
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Does the 5.x kernel support an interrupt from the PRU while also
> > > supporting the
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:51 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:47 PM Bruce Chidester
> wrote:
> >
> > Does the 5.x kernel support an interrupt from the PRU while also supporting
> > the bi-directional messaging through rproc?
>
> sorry, i completely missed these commits,
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:47 PM Bruce Chidester
wrote:
>
> Does the 5.x kernel support an interrupt from the PRU while also supporting
> the bi-directional messaging through rproc?
sorry, i completely missed these commits, so i have not personally
tested it... It got merged in v5.11.x and has
Does the 5.x kernel support an interrupt from the PRU while also supporting
the bi-directional messaging through rproc?
On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 12:38:08 PM UTC-5 RobertCNelson wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:36 PM Robert Nelson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:21 PM Bruce
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:36 PM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:21 PM Bruce Chidester
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused because I thought the plan was Remote Proc going forward. Do
> > you seem to say it is UIO going forward?
>
> Mainline has been 'slowly' getting RemoteProc
At Fri, 28 May 2021 10:21:11 -0700 (PDT) beagleboard@googlegroups.com wrote:
>
> I'm confused because I thought the plan was Remote Proc going forward. Do
> you seem to say it is UIO going forward?
Only that the *stock* mainline kernels don't have Remote Proc support. I
guess TI has not
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:21 PM Bruce Chidester
wrote:
>
> I'm confused because I thought the plan was Remote Proc going forward. Do you
> seem to say it is UIO going forward?
Mainline has been 'slowly' getting RemoteProc work done by TI..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/
--
I'm confused because I thought the plan was Remote Proc going forward. Do
you seem to say it is UIO going forward?
On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 12:15:34 PM UTC-5 hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
> At Fri, 28 May 2021 12:59:20 -0400 beagl...@googlegroups.com wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 28 May 2021
At Fri, 28 May 2021 12:59:20 -0400 beagleboard@googlegroups.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 May 2021 08:13:05 -0700 (PDT), in
> gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Bruce Chidester
> wrote:
>
> >I am using BBB Revision C
> >
> >Please help me get clarity on my assumptions that I believe I have
24 matches
Mail list logo
