- Original Message -
From: Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com
To: beaker-devel beaker-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 4:43:39 AM
Subject: [Beaker-devel] Feature requests for system performance monitoring
I thought we had some open feature requests for
- Original Message -
From: Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com
To: beaker-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:04:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Beaker-devel] Beaker 19.0 released
On 11/25/2014 04:54 PM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
On behalf of the Beaker development team,
- Original Message -
From: Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
To: beaker-devel beaker-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 2:24:16 AM
Subject: [Beaker-devel] Pre-defined access policies vs. system pools?
In Beaker 20 we are planning to implement pre-defined
Thank you very much! Great Job, I can't wait see it in production.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Róman Joost wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On behalf of the Beaker development team, I'm pleased to announce that
> Beaker 24.0 is now available from the Beaker web site [1]. Thanks to
>
Adding Keith Fryklund to the thread. I know he has automated things
previously he maybe able to help.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Shawn Doherty wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was hoping someone had an idea on the best way to get activity
> information from a system in beaker.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Róman Joost <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:25:47AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Róman Joost <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:12:19AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Róman Joost <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Jeff,
>> >
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Excerpts from Amit Saha's message of 2014-08-20 14:04 +10:00:
>> > 1. If we do not allow selecting the base image, we are effectively
>> > *not* obeying
>> > the distro selection in the job