I just implemented implicitly inferred GROUP BY syntax in the SQL client (bean-query). This means that if you omit the GROUP BY clause it will automatically infer it to be of the set of non-aggregate columns. Given the kind of usage this is getting, making it more convenient like this is worthwhile IMO. You can do something like this, for example:
> select account, sum(position); I can't think of any reason this would be a problem. If you know why SQL normally requires the explicit GROUP BY when it can be inferred automatically, please let me know. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhMVKe6Ny_1Btk5U27Zr06G_9k7zhV%2BPf0KKo%3DvZQmZjDQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
