Hi Juan Carlos,
Have you follow the tutorial or just give a quick look? If you _follow_
the instructions, you will see that you can, using Seaside One Click
experience, enable multiple images just copying the proper images and
changes files for the desired Squeak (3.9 or 3.10) and modifying
Hi, I have been interested in programming and thus a hobbyist since I was
nine years old in 1989. Since then I have programmed many programs using
various languages including, but not limited to, C, C++, Pascal, Assembly,
Java, Ruby, Python, Perl, C#, VBScript, Visual Basic, Batch, Powershell,
This would be a good start: http://squeakbyexample.org/
Miguel Cobá
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, I have been interested in programming and thus a hobbyist since I was
nine years old in 1989. Since then I have programmed many programs using
An by the way. Forget all you know about those languages. After learning
smalltalk, you'll never see the world the same way. Do ou remember Neo in
The Matrix when he sees the code of the matrix? :)
Cheers,
Miguel Cobá
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Miguel Cobá [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
Thanks, I downloaded the PDF, so I'll take a look at it.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Miguel Cobá [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be a good start: http://squeakbyexample.org/
Miguel Cobá
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, I have been
There was one I forgot to mention, which claims to use a similar production
paradigm to SmallTalk - that is Ruby. I've been programming in Ruby for
over a year now, which I know isn't the same, already, but it too is
completely Object Oriented and Object Based.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:18 AM,
Cool, thanks for the correction. I realized right away it was different.
Thanks for explaining.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 28.03.2008, at 17:28, Nathan Lane wrote:
There was one I forgot to mention, which claims to use a similar
production
Welcome, I am 14, and I just started with Smalltalk and Squeak, and I
personally feel that it is easier to use and understand, once you get a
basic understanding of how everything works. I have only really written
software in Java, and I have played around with C++ a bit, but Smalltalk is
my
That's good to hear - so I am wondering would people here place Squeak in a
category of Visual Programming Languages (visual like Visual Basic)?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:47 PM, David Zmick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome, I am 14, and I just started with Smalltalk and Squeak, and I
I don't think so.
I think that for visual programming you mean drag drop controls (buttons,
tables, input text, etc) to a canvas that will be show to the user as a
classical desktop app.
Smalltalk is not that (although you can do application with buttons and all
that) but much more. Isn't just
I'm on vacation and learning Smalltalk is how I'm spending my evenings
(family is young and goes to bed early). I downloaded a copy of Squeak
by Example (Version 2008-3-10) and the latest squeak for OS X:
Squeak3.9-7067mac vm 3.8.18beta1U
With the recommended dev-image:
sq3.9.1-7075dev08.03.1
11 matches
Mail list logo
