I posted a screenshot here:
http://image-fast.com/image/75d95183/linux.png
The shot was taken of Squeak3.10-7159-basic.image running on
Squeak3.10beta of 22 July 2007 [latest update: #7159]
I guess a lot of people would say it looks okay, but I'd like it to look
better/cleaner.
Its
Claus Kick wrote:
If you are on Windows or Linux, you could also try VisualAge from
Instantiations. Or Dolphin Smalltalk from Object-Arts, if you are on
Windows.
Claus
I played around with Visualage when I was looking at Smalltalk the first
time around. I was quite shocked to see
$7K sounds about right. VW with Envy was in that range as well. As was Gemstone.
I bet their commercial systems for big customers are still expensive.
That's why I was so excited when Squeak came out as it was the first
open-source Smalltalk that felt like Smalltalk.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at
I run on Linux and Windows regularly. There is no difference in how
fonts are rendered in a stock Squeak. My screen looks exactly like
yours.
The difference in the crispness is driven by the different fonts. Some
of the stock fonts are blurry. You can install new fonts or pick a
different font
I want to build a very simple site (as a learning exercise), that displays a
form, captures that data, modifies it slightly (on the Squeak server) and
then saves it to a totally different web server - just by using a REST
call.
On the face of it, it seems as though I need to use HttpSocket to do
Hi Steve,
I was pretty busy with a lot of things but this answer helps me a lot.
I'm now using this for the translation. I would use mercurial or any
decentralized control version system, instead of SVN and TeXmacs instead
of LaTeX for the spanish version (because of its graphical and easy to
