age-
>>From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM
>>To: begin begin
>>Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor
>>
>>
>>I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the*
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:43:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott
Barnett) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am new to Perl just over a month now. I have tried other programming languages and
>they just seem to hard to understand. I have found Perl to be a lot easier to
>understand, and that brings me to my questio
> > I read one comment about Crimson Editor - it can fit on a floppy I
> > can remember when that was a given - fit on a floppy.
SciTE can too (unpacked!) : http://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html
Though if you wanted macros you'd have to install FilerX :
http://llt.chez.tiscali.fr/
which is another
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:22 , perl wrote:
[..]
> Was that to scare us newcomers to Perl
I can't speak for anyone else, but 'scare' is too
strong a word for my intentions - unless by that
we mean oblige folks to remember that 'coding'
is about 'putting the stuff between the curley brace
rent equipment,
> why take the time. For me time is money. Spend you time
> where it counts. Not to keep up with the "Jones".
>
> Timothy Lungstrom
> owner of Kracked Press Production
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> **
>
>
see inline comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM
> To: begin begin
> Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor
>
>
> I'm surprised that more posters didn&#
I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the* editor.
I think it is linux world that did a survey and found that 80 percent of
the users picked vim as their favorite editor.
I originally started using vim, then switched to nedit, and now have
switched back to vim. Nedit if very ni
Well, I am working on linux, and I started with pico but now I use vi and am
quite happy with it; fast movement, versatile copy-paste, colored syntax
toggling...it does the job. I'll have to give nedit a look though if there
are any linux offerings...people seem to be raving about it.
regards
You may want to also check out TextPad,.. been using it for over 3 years and
love it. Great for Perl or PHP programming,.. nice HTML editor also ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 6:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 08:04 , Nikola Janceski wrote:
> Yep even the best of syntax highlighting patterns still can't handle some
> of
> those FUNKY regexs I use in my perl program.
don't EVEN get me started...
{ "too late drieux" }
hum. parenting code, is like parentin
I've been using EditPlus for awhile now on Win32 platform...
http://www.editplus.com/
The $$ I paid for it a couple years ago (it's $30 now) seems to have
been worth it, although after looking at the Crimson Editor website, it
looks quite similar and is free...a good price. I've also tried the
K
x27;s v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor
>
[snip]
>
> Many editors now come with various forms of 'colour'
> for providing 'syntax mark up' - that will provide
> 'visual clues' to when one has injected a 'typo' into
> a script. This helps IF yo
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 06:43 , Scott Barnett wrote:
[..]
> What is a good Perl Editor for writing scripts?
The Correct Answer is:
The one on the machine where you do your editing.
That simplifies the process for you.
I am partial to doing my development with bbedit 6.
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Editor
>
>
> Is anybody using GNU Emacs to write perl programs? Is its
> perl-mode good
> enough to compete with nedit and alike? I've been using Emacs
> for almost
> anything (including C++, Latex, Perl ...) and hardly ever
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Connie Chan wrote:
>
> I am new to Perl just over a month now. I have tried other programming languages
>and they just seem to hard to
> understand. I have found Perl to be a lot easier to understand, and that brings me
>to my question. What is a good Perl
> Editor for wri
perhaps you haven't dl-ed the latest version of nedit.
It's up to 5.3 now, and has come along way from version 4.2.
> -Original Message-
> From: Connie Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:57 AM
> To: Scott Barnett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Me too !! This editor is the greatest I found on Win OS.
But have you download the Syntax pack for Perl ? Go ahead
if no.
Anyway, the other choice for me is Note Tab Lite. But seems
very unstable if I am using Chinese ( Perhaps that do not
have any infect on you ).
But if you are doing a global
nedit.org <-- the best there is (in my book)
> -Original Message-
> From: Angerstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: Scott Barnett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: Editor
>
>
> I really love nedit.
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > V
I use vi everyday. vi rules! Universally available (I also use gVIM
for Windoze); no silly configuration files; most of the needed commands
are only one or two keystrokes! Live is good!
Dennis ;-)
anton wrote:
>
> I've listen to you all about the editors problem
> Is anybody out there still
quot;:syn-on" isn't implemented, huh? Guess I'm stuck with some weird version.
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:06 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Editor
>
&
x27;t implemented, huh? Guess I'm stuck with some weird version.
>-Original Message-
>From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Editor
--
AMD FAQ
http://performancefiles.cjb.net/
In vim it's not necessary unless you use a modifier like g or c at the
end.
I'm not sure about "standard" vi, tho.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Guilherme Pinto wrote:
> Couldn't agree more, but... didn't you forget to close your subtitution with a
>trailing slash?
>
> :25,45 s/^/#/
>
> vi Rocks
>
ECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re: Editor
>
> You know at the risk of starting a huge flamewar here (tho I doubt it'll
> happen - people seem really reasonable on this list) I'm going to put in
> my $0.02 for not just learning vi, but becoming fluent with it:
>
> 1. It&#x
er entirely in vi or with vi and perl
combined. That's when things get real fun :-)
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daryl J. Hoyt wrote:
> I use vi only when nothing else is available. ;->
>
> -Original Message-
> From: anton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 06,
I use vi only when nothing else is available. ;->
-Original Message-
From: anton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Editor
I've listen to you all about the editors problem
Is anybody out there still using the ol
YES!
Try http://www.vim.org for a 'vi on steroids'...
If you area vi freak, you'll love vim!
-Original Message-
From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Editor
anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've listen to you all about the editors problem
?
>Is anybody out there still using the old bottom-dweller vi ?
>
>On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:48:53 +0200, Matija Papec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Aigner-Torres, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Hi Bill,
>> >
Boise, Idaho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Editor
"Aigner-Torres, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Bill,
>
>my choice is gnuemacs
Does
You mean there something other than vi? Do you mean vim?
On 06 Jul 2001 16:07:36 +0300, anton wrote:
> I've listen to you all about the editors problem
> Is anybody out there still using the old bottom-dweller vi ?
>
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:48:53 +0200, Matija Papec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've listen to you all about the editors problem
Is anybody out there still using the old bottom-dweller vi ?
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:48:53 +0200, Matija Papec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Aigner-Torres, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi Bill,
> >
> >my choice is gnuemacs
>
> Does it suppo
"Aigner-Torres, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Bill,
>
>my choice is gnuemacs
Does it support script debugging? I'm looking for nice *nix editor
/debugger with breakpoints, step execution, etc. Have you tried
PerlComposer?
>with cperl!
What is cperl?
--
Matija
Ultra edit is the best for windows..
Ryan
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Rajeev Rumale wrote:
> You must have got many good ones by now.
> If not here is one more shareware. http://www.ultraedit.com
>
> Rajeev
>
> ~~~
> Rajeev Rumale
> MyAngel.Ne
com or
> >http://synedit.hypermart.net
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Luke Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 03 July 2001 20:35
> >To: Bill Pierson
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Editor
> >
> >
> >www.vim.org
> >
: RE: Editor
We are very new to programming and especially to Perl.
We were following this thread closely and only saw a couple
of replies. Wondering if there are any other editors that would
do all that is needed for Perl and possibly even C++, Java, Visual Basic,
ect
The reason for this is we are
Hi Bill,
my choice is gnuemacs with cperl!
cheers,
mario
-Original Message-
From: Bill Pierson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Editor
Hello again, all.
May I get some suggestions for any Windows-based PERL development to
At 20:00 03.07.2001 -0500, RL Autry wrote:
>We are very new to programming and especially to Perl.
>We were following this thread closely and only saw a couple
>of replies. Wondering if there are any other editors that would
>do all that is needed for Perl and possibly even C++, Java, Visual Basic
At 10:14 PM 7/3/2001, Rajeev Rumale wrote:
>You must have got many good ones by now.
>If not here is one more shareware. http://www.ultraedit.com
>
>Rajeev
Actually all we got was about 4 including yours.
Someone on another list told me about
GNU Emacs.
I need to find out what this one is.
Did
You must have got many good ones by now.
If not here is one more shareware. http://www.ultraedit.com
Rajeev
~~~
Rajeev Rumale
MyAngel.Net Pte Ltd.,Phone :
(65)8831530 (office)
#04-01, 180 B,
editplus. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris G Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:59 PM
> To: Beginners perl; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Editor
>
>
>
> i use synedit its free and very good !! check out
Hey Bill,
Tuesday, July 03, 2001, 3:33:42 PM, my MUA believes you used
Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 to write:
BP> May I get some suggestions for any Windows-based PERL development
BP> tools? Preferably, free ones?
I like Vim www.vim.org and TextPad www.textpad.com.
Both have conte
/3/2001, Kris G Findlay wrote:
>i use synedit its free and very good !! check out www.mkidesign.com or
>http://synedit.hypermart.net
>-Original Message-
>From: Luke Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 03 July 2001 20:35
>To: Bill Pierson
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subje
i use synedit its free and very good !! check out www.mkidesign.com or
http://synedit.hypermart.net
-Original Message-
From: Luke Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 July 2001 20:35
To: Bill Pierson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Editor
www.vim.org
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Bill
www.vim.org
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Bill Pierson wrote:
> Hello again, all.
>
> May I get some suggestions for any Windows-based PERL development tools? Preferably,
>free ones?
>
> Thanks,
> --Bill
>
>
Context is my choice:
http://www.fixedsys.com/context/
Tyler
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Pierson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:33 PM
Subject: Editor
Hello again, all.
May I get some suggestions for any Windows-based PERL development t
44 matches
Mail list logo
