Ing. Branislav Gerzo wrote:
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 09:11 (-0500)
contributed this to our collective wisdom:
(really beginners) could think @a will empty array, which is not
true.
JN yes it is true, they are both empty lists:
@a will not empty array, here it is:
my @a
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [D], on Friday, April 29, 2005 at 08:43 (-0400)
thoughtfully wrote the following:
DSo which is safer more ideal to use : || , or
I think or is better - it makes perl language more readable for
beginners.
--
How do you protect mail on web? I use http://www.2pu.net
[Join the
AM
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [D], on Friday, April 29, 2005 at 09:30 (-0400)
wrote about:
DOc well, I am trying to get beyond a beginner as I have doing Perl for 3
DOc years now so is your answer still the same?
I think really good programmers write nice readable programs
(scripts), so begginers should
I think really good programmers write nice readable programs
(scripts), so begginers should understand that sooner. I think, that's
why better using or instead ||.
Come-on guys! Read your mails. John Krahn spent the time to write a
wonderful explanation why || simply DOES NOT WORK when used
Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 14.43 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So which is safer more ideal to use : || , or
Derek B. Smith
OhioHealth IT
UNIX / TSM / EDM Teams
[...]
The only difference between || and or is the precedence, and the
precedence of = lies between them.
To my understanding, in
|-Original Message-
|From: Ing. Branislav Gerzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:11 PM
|To: beginners@perl.org
|Subject: Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f and - il- - - - f
|
|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] [D], on Friday, April 29, 2005 at 09:30 (-0400)
|wrote about
-Original Message-
From: John Doe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 8:50 AM
To: beginners@perl.org
Subject: Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f and - il- - - - f
Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 14.43 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So which is safer more ideal to use
On 4/28/05, John W. Krahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage wrote:
On 4/27/05, John W. Krahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage wrote:
4 open (V4, samcmd v4 2\1 | ) || die unable to open pipe...
Broken?$!;
Don't do this. the precedence of || is too high. your code attempts
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
I think really good programmers write nice readable programs
(scripts), so begginers should understand that sooner. I think, that's
why better using or instead ||.
Come-on guys! Read your mails. John Krahn spent the time to write a
wonderful explanation why || simply DOES
Jay Savage wrote:
[big snip]
I will admit that my response to OP didn't take into account that, in
his particular case, the argument to open was a literal and || was
being evaluated at compile time. But the fact remains that it is
simply and demonstrably not true that open will never attempt to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will answer and ask all questions in one email! k.
8foreach (V4) {
Is there any good reason to slurp the entire file into memory?
What would you suggest? I want to read the entire file via a filehandle.
I have plenty of system memory, therefore why not?
Why
John W. Krahn [JWK], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 17:29 (-0700) has
on mind:
JWK my @a; creates the lexical variable @a at compile time and since it has
just
JWK been created it will be empty. my @a = (); creates the variable during
JWK compilation but the assignment (IIRC) has to be done at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [D], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 12:55
(-0400) wrote the following:
D But I do not understand what the (split)[-1] is saying? please explain.
it gets last splitted value from the list.
(split)[0] #get the first splitted value
(split)[0,1] #get first and second splitted
(really beginners) could think @a will empty array, which is not
true.
yes it is true, they are both empty lists:
perl -mstrict -MData::Dumper -we 'my @x;my @y = ();print Dumper [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED];'
Show me any difference in @x and @y :)
Its about when and how its handled and
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 09:11 (-0500)
contributed this to our collective wisdom:
(really beginners) could think @a will empty array, which is not
true.
JN yes it is true, they are both empty lists:
@a will not empty array, here it is:
my @a = q{foo bar};
@a;
Ing. Branislav Gerzo wrote:
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 09:11 (-0500)
contributed this to our collective wisdom:
(really beginners) could think @a will empty array, which is not
true.
JN yes it is true, they are both empty lists:
@a will not empty array, here it is:
I
On 4/27/05, John W. Krahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage wrote:
4 open (V4, samcmd v4 2\1 | ) || die unable to open pipe...
Broken?$!;
Don't do this. the precedence of || is too high. your code attempts
to open a pipe, and if it can't, then it attempts to open die... and
Jay Savage wrote:
On 4/27/05, John W. Krahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage wrote:
4 open (V4, samcmd v4 2\1 | ) || die unable to open pipe...
Broken?$!;
Don't do this. the precedence of || is too high. your code attempts
to open a pipe, and if it can't, then it attempts to open die...
yes I agree I was a little ambiguous... I was in a hurry. sorry. Anyway
here is my updated code. and here is a sample output:
My goal is to get all F01 which I am but I am having issues capturing all
of these values into my array. When I run the I get the data I want to see
which is just the F01
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I agree I was a little ambiguous... I was in a hurry. sorry. Anyway
Then do it at a later time and do it right, I imagine most all of us are
busy also :)
here is my updated code. and here is a sample output:
My goal is to get all F01 which I am but I am having
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 08:15 (-0500)
thoughtfully wrote the following:
5 my @fa =();
6 my @ha =();
JN my @fa;
JN my @ha;
JN the = () isn't necessary and doesn't keep you from getting uninitialized
JN value warnings like you think it does, thats only scalars.
I
On 4/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I agree I was a little ambiguous... I was in a hurry. sorry. Anyway
here is my updated code. and here is a sample output:
My goal is to get all F01 which I am but I am having issues capturing all
of these values into my array. When I
Jay Savage [JS], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 10:26 (-0400)
thoughtfully wrote the following:
JS If all you want is the last column, this is a really long way to go about
it.
JS while (V4) {
JS print (split)[7];
JS print \n;
JS }
(split)[-1] is better, not ?
--
How do
If all you want is the last column, this is a really long way to go about it.
while (V4) {
print (split)[7];
print \n;
}
I think that won't work due to some rows formatted like so:
2005/01/20 15:39 17 2% -il-o-b- - - - - sg F01000
unless that was typo?
In that case 7
Ing. Branislav Gerzo wrote:
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 08:15 (-0500)
thoughtfully wrote the following:
5 my @fa =();
6 my @ha =();
JN my @fa;
JN my @ha;
JN the = () isn't necessary and doesn't keep you from getting uninitialized
JN value warnings like you think it
On 4/27/05, Ing. Branislav Gerzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage [JS], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 10:26 (-0400)
thoughtfully wrote the following:
JS If all you want is the last column, this is a really long way to go about
it.
JS while (V4) {
JS print (split)[7];
JS
On 4/27/05, JupiterHost.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If all you want is the last column, this is a really long way to go about
it.
while (V4) {
print (split)[7];
print \n;
}
I think that won't work due to some rows formatted like so:
2005/01/20 15:39 17
I was assuming it was a typo/email munge, and that the command he
pipes actually produces consistent output. That may be a faulty
assumption on my part. YOu know what they say about assumptions In
Its hard to say Derek doesn't give us much to work with :)
general, though, when parsing log files
cc
AM
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes that is true, [5,6,7] need to be typed otherwise all entries are not
Yes what is true? Please reply inline.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://learn.perl.org/ http://learn.perl.org/first-response
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
PM
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I agree I was a little ambiguous... I was in a hurry. sorry. Anyway
here is my updated code. and here is a sample output:
My goal is to get all F01 which I am but I am having issues capturing all
of these values into my array. When I run the I get the data I want to
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 10:23 (-0500)
thinks about:
JN No its not, you can if you want but it pointless:
I read it somewhere (it was perl cookbook/learning perl from o'reilly
maybe). Always declare
my @a = ( );
And here is why, if I remember correctly - if you
You do realize that the characters 'F', '0' and '1' are included in the
character class \w which split() is removing? :-)
yeah I realized that typo too late :), I meant \s not \w but then plain
old my @tmp = split; is even better :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Ing. Branislav Gerzo wrote:
JupiterHost.Net [JN], on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 10:23 (-0500)
thinks about:
JN No its not, you can if you want but it pointless:
I read it somewhere (it was perl cookbook/learning perl from o'reilly
maybe). Always declare
my @a = ( );
And here is why, if I
Subject
Re: REGEXP removing - il- - -b-f
and - il- - - - f
40 matches
Mail list logo
