>
>I think you have an over-elaborate design for this anyway. I think it's
>likely that your data can be processed better than just by skipping 'n'
>lines between useful records. And even if this is the way you want to go
>there's nothing wrong with
well- my design is likely not that great over
William M West wrote:
>
> in the post that i am now replying to, i said that i couldn't get
> the program to skip lines as it parsed through the output of another
> program.
>
> i have "solved" the problem- but i do not know WHY this works the
> way it does.
>
>
>
>
>
> this worked great :) (than
in the post that i am now replying to, i said that i couldn't get
the program to skip lines as it parsed through the output of another
program.
i have "solved" the problem- but i do not know WHY this works the
way it does.
this worked great :) (thanks to drieux) - in fact, it would let
