On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:24:14PM -0400, Nikola Janceski wrote:
Then I am really confused, how can I cause the scope of $\ to extend only to
the end of the file and not into the other modules??
You can't. However, you might be able to confine your local version of $\
to only those operations
From: Nikola Janceski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then I am really confused, how can I cause the scope of $\ to extend
only to the end of the file and not into the other modules??
I'm afraid you can't.
You could (using some Tie::Handle magic) change the filehandle so
that each print to that filehandle
line 4, near my $\
Execution of /usr/nj/pl.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
-Original Message-
From: Jenda Krynicky [mailto:Jenda;Krynicky.cz]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Beginners (E-mail)
Subject: Re: local()! Explain, please?
at the top of my script
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:02:15PM -0400, Nikola Janceski wrote:
local $\ = \n;
now ... isn't local supposed to modify the listed variables to be local to
the enclosing block, file, or eval. ?
[snip]
Am I just misunderstanding the use of local?
Yes, but the documentation
From: Nikola Janceski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I was fuming mad. I have been struggling with a program that is
supposed to send a simple e-mail... or so I thought!
for 2 days I have sent test e-mails all of them with headers in the
e-mail and attachments all screwy. then I found the culprit.
Okay, I was fuming mad. I have been struggling with a program that is
supposed to send a simple e-mail...
or so I thought!
for 2 days I have sent test e-mails all of them with headers in the e-mail
and attachments all screwy.
then I found the culprit.
at the top of my script is:
local $\ = \n;
