Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread iain truskett
* Kiarash Em. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Dec 2001 06:29]: > mySQL vs postgreSQL?!?! > check this out > http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2705.php3?page=1 > ;) Hmm. Seems rather out of date wrt postgres. 8kb rows? Is that of data? Because postgres quite happily has field types that allow

RE: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Curtis Poe
--- Mike Gargiullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oracle is > > How many inserts/second are you taking about? If anyone would like to follow-up on this, it might be better to email me directly rather than continue this very off-topic thread :) I don't know how many inserts per second.

RE: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Mike Gargiullo
Oracle is How many inserts/second are you taking about? -Original Message- From: Curtis Poe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:52 PM To: Etienne Marcotte Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mysqlpostgres --- Etienne Marcotte <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Curtis Poe
--- Etienne Marcotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MySQL is about speed, unless you do tons of inserts and absolutely can't > afford table locking, go with mysql.. Regrettably, we do have to handle tons of inserts, so this is problematic. The software that we're evaluating databases for offers

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Etienne Marcotte
well mySQL *DO* now support transactions with innoDB www.innoDB.com There is a guy from the innoDB team also on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that can probably answer all your questions. MySQL is about speed, unless you do tons of inserts and absolutely can't afford table locking, go with mysql.. Plu

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Curtis Poe
--- "Kiarash Em." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mySQL vs postgreSQL?!?! > > check this out > > http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2705.php3?page=1 > > ;) While we're on the subject of databases, my company is considering switching from MS SQL Server. We absolutely need transactions,

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-10 Thread Kiarash Em.
mySQL vs postgreSQL?!?! check this out http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2705.php3?page=1 ;) >From: "Brett W. McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: nafiseh saberi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: mysqlpostgres &g

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-06 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <000801c17e49$4a172df0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nafiseh Saberi) wrote: > why do you use always "mysql" and > not "postgres" ?? who said nobody uses postgresql? -- brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Perl services for hire CGI Meta FAQ - http://www.perl.org/CGI_MetaFAQ.ht

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-06 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, nafiseh saberi wrote: > why do you use always "mysql" and > not "postgres" ?? I use PostgreSQL myself, have since like 1997 or so. -- Brett http://www.chapelperilous.net/ --

Re: mysql....postgres

2001-12-06 Thread Djoko Priyono
nafiseh saberi menulis pd tgl 06 December 2001 Thursday 06:29 pm sbb: :: hi dear team... :: :: why do you use always "mysql" and :: not "postgres" ?? Not always use mysql, I use Postgres for my database. Regards, Djoko Priyono www.dnet.net.id :: :: thx for your time. :: _

mysql....postgres

2001-12-06 Thread nafiseh saberi
hi dear team... why do you use always "mysql" and not "postgres" ?? thx for your time. Best regards. Nafiseh Saberi www.iraninfocenter.net www.sorna.net Beaty is in the eye of the beholder. _