Rance == Rance Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rance All of my other lists behave in the reverse, if you reply, it goes to
Rance the list, if you reply all, a second copy goes to the individual.
Oh geez. Here we go again.
Please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html.
And
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
: Oh geez. Here we go again.
:
: Please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html.
: And understand that *no* list managed at lists.perl.org will
: *ever* have reply-to set. Thank goodness. :)
:
: Your other lists coddle to the beginners who can't operate
On Sat, 2006-29-04 at 07:47 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Rance == Rance Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rance All of my other lists behave in the reverse, if you reply, it goes to
Rance the list, if you reply all, a second copy goes to the individual.
Oh geez. Here we go again.
In practice, I use two types of replies. One to all the list
recipients and one to only the author of this particular message.
It's silly to send the message to the entire list and send a
duplicate to the author. (He already has a copy because he is a
member of the list.)
I do agree
On 4/27/06, Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:27:06PM -0400, Ryan Frantz wrote:
I tend to agree with the principles on which you base your opinion, but
I don't think they're properly applied here, necessarily. I've never
been subscribed to any other interactive
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:42:51AM -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
some mail readers are probably capable of reading the list header and
figuring it out, but I bet others don't (like mine)
I use Mutt, which allows me to list-reply, but without setting up custom
configurations it
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:48:01AM -0400, Jay Savage wrote:
On 4/27/06, Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to agree with the principles on which you base your opinion, but
I don't think they're properly applied here, necessarily. I've never
been subscribed to any other interactive
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:20:52AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
The *only* way you lose functionality by rewriting reply-to is if you
also munge from so it looks like the massage came from the list. I've
know lists that do that, but this isn't one of them.
That would be a change in list
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:22:16PM -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
I'm working on a new perl script thats giving me fits.
[snip]
I just sent a lengthy reply to this that was supposed to go to the list,
but accidentally sent it to the individual. I don't care to try to
Timothy Johnson wrote:
The confusion comes from the poor wording of the perldoc.
As a special case, specifying a PATTERN of space (' ') will
split on white space just as split with no arguments does.
Thus, split(' ') can be used to emulate awk's default
behavior, whereas split(/ /) will
On 4/27/06, Rance Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
just to let everyone know, (I thought I had done this already but with
the list reply stuff I messed that up)
The problem is fixed, my split was correct, but my test to see if my
split was correct was wrong
Glad you got it worked out!
Jay Savage schreef:
for (0..#$arrayname) { print $array[$_] }
The #$ should be $# and you have two different array names there
that I assume you meant equal.
Alternative 1:
print $ary[$_] for $[ .. $#ary;
Alternative 2:
print for @ary;
--
Affijn, Ruud
Gewoon is een tijger.
On 4/27/06, Dr.Ruud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Savage schreef:
for (0..#$arrayname) { print $array[$_] }
The #$ should be $# and you have two different array names there
that I assume you meant equal.
Not enough coffee this morning, I guess, but the point was to
illustrate, not give
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:42:51AM -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
some mail readers are probably capable of reading the list header and
figuring it out, but I bet others don't (like mine)
I use Mutt, which allows me to list-reply, but without setting up custom
configurations it doesn't use
-Original Message-
From: Chad Perrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:14 PM
To: beginners@perl.org
Subject: Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:42:51AM -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
some mail readers are probably
Ryan Frantz schreef:
The choice of munging the reply-to is left up to the list manager,
really, and (hopefully) is determined by the type/flow of traffic on
the list. In some cases, it makes sense to set the reply-to, in
others, not.
Some clients (and servers) support the
Mail-Reply-To and
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:27:06PM -0400, Ryan Frantz wrote:
Personally, I don't mind it either way as I always double-check my
replies and their destinations to be sure they're what I intended. Just
because email is fast and convenient, doesn't mean that we should ignore
simple steps such
Chad Perrin schreef:
Do you, perhaps, lack an email client that properly
handles the list-reply header yourself?
A capitalized RE: makes me expect the worst.
I am a member of plenty of technical lists (perl, procmail, etc.) that
don't munge the Reply-To.
When I use a mail-client like
I'm working on a new perl script thats giving me fits.
Ive never quite seen anything like this.
here is the command that is not giving me the results I want.
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
what should have happened was that if there was any whitespace in the
file (including new lines, and
On 4/26/06, Rance Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
This usage of split only splits at spaces. For example, if $domaintlist contains
'a b c', you will get ('a', 'b', 'c'). It has nothing to do with other
kinds of spaces.
If you meant
@domain = split /\s+/,
What happens if you are more specific?
@domain = split(/\w/,$domainlist);
-Original Message-
From: Rance Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:22 PM
To: beginners@perl.org
Subject: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.
I'm working on a new perl
On Wed, 2006-26-04 at 15:22 -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
I'm working on a new perl script thats giving me fits.
Ive never quite seen anything like this.
here is the command that is not giving me the results I want.
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
what should have happened was that if
On 4/26/06, Rance Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
$domainlist = test.domain.com\n\ntest2.domain.com\n\n
@domain becomes test.domain.comtest2.domain.com with
just one element.
Could there be some other character in $domainlist? When I use \n as
you're
Mr. Shawn H. Corey wrote:
: On Wed, 2006-26-04 at 15:22 -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
:
: @domain = split /\s+/, $domainlist;
:
: It's not splitting on whitespace since you are telling it to
: split on a single space character (ASCII 0x20).
I thought a single space character was whitespace.
-Original Message-
From: Mr. Shawn H. Corey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Rance Hall
Cc: beginners@perl.org
Subject: Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.
On Wed, 2006-26-04 at 15:22 -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
I'm working on a new
Adriano Ferreira schreef:
Rance Hall:
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
This usage of split only splits at spaces.
perldoc -f split:
As a special case, specifying a PATTERN of space (' ') will
split on white space just as split with no arguments does.
--
Affijn, Ruud
Gewoon is een
Mr. Shawn H. Corey schreef:
Rance Hall:
@domain = split(' ',$domainlist);
@domain = split /\s+/, $domainlist;
It's not splitting on whitespace since you are telling it to split on
a single space character (ASCII 0x20).
perldoc -f split:
As a special case, specifying a PATTERN of space
The confusion comes from the poor wording of the perldoc.
As a special case, specifying a PATTERN of space (' ') will
split on white space just as split with no arguments does.
Thus, split(' ') can be used to emulate awk's default
behavior, whereas split(/ /) will give you as many
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:22:16PM -0500, Rance Hall wrote:
I'm working on a new perl script thats giving me fits.
[snip]
I just sent a lengthy reply to this that was supposed to go to the list,
but accidentally sent it to the individual. I don't care to try to
reconstruct it. It probably
Chad Perrin schreef:
Is there a particular reason this list uses list-reply, with reply
defaulting only to the individual?
I use a usenet-interface, and that doesn't have this 'problem'.
news://nntp.perl.org/perl.beginners
--
Affijn, Ruud
Gewoon is een tijger.
--
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:35:07AM +0200, Dr.Ruud wrote:
Chad Perrin schreef:
Is there a particular reason this list uses list-reply, with reply
defaulting only to the individual?
I use a usenet-interface, and that doesn't have this 'problem'.
news://nntp.perl.org/perl.beginners
I
Chad Perrin schreef:
Dr.Ruud:
Chad Perrin:
Is there a particular reason this list uses list-reply, with reply
defaulting only to the individual?
I use a usenet-interface, and that doesn't have this 'problem'.
news://nntp.perl.org/perl.beginners
I don't (and don't really want to), so I
32 matches
Mail list logo
